Skip to main content

version 10 - In Compile "InlineExternalDefinitions" doesn't work anymore in Mma v10 like in v9


In Mma 9 using CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True} inside of Compile inlined the values of the previously defined parameters used in the function to be compiled.


For example:


nPara = 3;
cf = Compile[{{x, _Real, 1}},
Sum[x[[i]], {i, nPara}],
CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True}

]

resultes in:


Output Mma9


and works flawless as expected.


But in Mma 10 the output is:


Output Mma10


And, as now the value of nPara is not known to the compiled function, the comiled function doesn't work anymore.


For such a simple function one can apply Whith as a workaround:


With[{nPara = nPara},

Compile[{{x, _Real, 1}},
Sum[x[[i]], {i, nPara}],
CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True}
]
]

However, in bigger notebooks and with more complex functions this undocumented code break (or is a bug or a fix) causes bigger issues.


Does anyone know a more convenient or automated workaround to fix this problem?



Answer



It is unfortunate that this no longer works. I like metaprogramming, and I felt that inlining variables is a nice exercise, so I can share some functions with you that make things easier.



Your approach using With seems reasonable. I also saw you test an example using Evaluate, but relying on the fact that x[[i]] evaluates to x[[i]] if i not an integer and x has no value is quite bad.


You say that your approach using With will not work for more complicated cases. If the issue is that you want to use evaluation to determine the values of your parameters, you can use the following.


ClearAll@inlineEval
SetAttributes[inlineEval, HoldAll];
inlineEval[expr_, symbols__] :=
Unevaluated[expr] /.
Thread[Rule[HoldPattern /@ Unevaluated[{symbols}], {symbols}]]

You can use it as follows. Let's set up a situation that is relatively hard to deal with to test it.


b := c[1, 2]

c[x_, y_] := x + y

Now we can do


cfu =
inlineEval[
Compile[{{x, _Integer}}, Sum[1, {i, x + b}]]
,
b
];
cfu[3]



6

If you don't want to use evaluation, you can use the following.


SetAttributes[inlineAll, HoldAll]
inlineAll[expr_, symbols__Symbol] :=
ReleaseHold[
HoldComplete[expr] //.
Flatten[Function[Null, {OwnValues@#, DownValues@#}, HoldAll] /@

Unevaluated[{symbols}]]
];

Now you can also this, but note that you have to specify that c has to be inlined as well.


cfu2 =
inlineAll[
Compile[{{x, _Integer}}, Sum[1, {i, x + b}]]
,
b, c
];

cfu2[3]


6

Note that both functions also with symbols that have DownValues, which is something I believe "InlineExternalDefinitions" could not deal with to begin with. The previous examples dealt only with constants, but here is an example where we inline a function.


f[x_] := Norm[x];
cfu3 =
inlineAll[
Compile[{{x, _Real, 1}}, f[x] + 3]

,
f
];
cfu3[{1., 1.}] == Sqrt[2] + 3


True

This technique allows you to make large compiled functions, while maintaining readability. You could imagine that when compiled functions get too large, you simply let one compiled function call another compiled function, and optionally using "InlineCompiledFunctions". But I like this alternative :).


Related (but probably less nice than this)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...