Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - NMinimize to optimize function Module



I am using Nminimize for simulation based optimization. I define the objective function (simulation with a variable "a") as a module to be used in the minimization. What I have found is if I do not print the function value (f[a]) using the EvaluationMonitor, NMinimize outputs 1000s of iterations of possible values for "a" extremely quickly without running the corresponding simulation run (because if it runs simulations, it will need few seconds for each simulation run and can not do 1000s of simulations in no time). However, when I include "f[a]" in the evaluation monitor, NMinimize runs the simulation for each possible value of "a" it outputs, but is disconnected to the optimization process. This is evident because NMinimize does not converge even after 1000s of iterations, when there are only 10 possible values "a" can take and I know the minimum occurs at "a"=10. Will someone help me understand what I am missing?


demand[n_,k_]:=Min[k Vf,n capacity];
supply[n_,k_]:=Min[(n Kj-k) w,n capacity];
flo[n_,Ku_,Kd_]:=Min[demand[n,Ku],supply[n,Kd]];
dx=Vf*dt;capacity=w*Vf*Kj/(Vf+w);Kj=150.;w=20.;Vf=100.;
n=Round[Flen/dx];m=Round[SimTime/dt];p=Round[Rlen/dx];RMLocation=Round[(2/3) p];
\[Alpha][a1_]:=1800.;\[Beta][a2_]:=0.1;L=1.;Flen=4.;Rlen=3.;delta = 1.;SimTime=15./60.;dt=6./3600.;
f[a_]:=Module[{k0=ConstantArray[0,n],kr=Table[Table[0,{i1,1,p}],{i2,1,n}],\[Gamma]=ConstantArray[1,n],\[Phi]},
Clear[j];j=0;RM[x_,t_]:=100 a;k=k0;
For[i=2,i
NtwrkTT=TT=Plus@@(Plus@@kr);
While[TT>0,
For[i=2,i FQin=If[i==2,Min[demand[L,k0[[i-1]]],supply[L,k0[[i]]]],FQout];
dem=demand[L,k0[[i]]];dem=If[dem==0,0.001,dem];
\[Gamma][[i]]=Min[1,supply[L,k0[[i+1]]]/dem];
\[Phi]=\[Gamma][[i]] demand[1,kr[[i,p]]]/delta;
Qr=(\[Phi]-\[Beta][i dx] FQin) dx;
FQout=Min[demand[L,k0[[i]]],supply[L,k0[[i+1]]]];
k[[i]]=k0[[i]]+(FQin-FQout+Qr)/Vf;kr0=kr[[i]];

For[ir=2,ir<=p,ir++,
MR=If[ir==RMLocation+1,RM[i dx,j dt],capacity];
RQin=Min[MR,If[ir==2,flo[1,kr0[[ir-1]],kr0[[ir]]],RQout]];
MR=If[ir==RMLocation,RM[i dx,j dt],capacity];
RQout=Min[MR,If[ir kr[[i,ir]]=kr0[[ir]]+(RQin-RQout)/Vf];
kr[[i,1]]=If[j<=m,\[Alpha][i dx] delta/Vf,0]];
TT=Plus@@(Plus@@kr);
TT+=Plus@@k;
k0=k;NtwrkTT+=TT;j++];

NtwrkTT dt]
NMinimize[{f[a],3<=a<=12&&Element[a,Integers]},a,Method->"SimulatedAnnealing",EvaluationMonitor:>Print["a = ",a]]

edit: I edited this post extensively to make it clear. Apologize for any confusion.



Answer



I found the solution on another website "http://eternaldisturbanceincosmos.wordpress.com/2011/04/27/nminimize-in-mathematica-could-drive-you-insane/" which says "It turns out that NMinimize does not hold its arguments. This means that as the list of arguments is read from left to right, each argument is evaluated and replaced by the result of the evaluation". So I used Hold[] in the NMinimize function that fixed the problem.


Edit: Please see the responses/comments on Simulated Annealing Convergence


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....