Skip to main content

Is it possible to import dates and times directly as AbsoluteTime and by pass DateLists?



Date and time calculations are quite slow so I am exploring ways to minimize the number of calculations performed. As an example:


msft = FinancialData["MSFT", "Jan 1, 2005"]
Timing[DateListPlot[msft]]
{0.253632, *picture*}

whereas


Timing[
msft1 = msft;
msft1[[All, 1]] = AbsoluteTime /@ msft[[All, 1]];
DateListPlot[msft1]

]
{0.214658, *picture*}

So it is faster to convert to AbsoluteTime and make a plot than to stick with date lists (as a side issue this can actually be done even faster with ListPlot or ListLinePlot and a tick function).


When wanting to work with date lists to select subsets of data you will typically choose a search criteria in which the absolute time of elements is tested against some condition. So this is another example where it is useful to already have the data in absolute time.


So the question is whether it is possible to import dates directly into Mathematica and have them as absolute times rather than date lists. My two specific examples would be FinancialData as per the example above -- can this be made to output absolute times via some configuration rather than having to convert the data post import? Also for Excel spreadsheets containing columns with dates (i.e. date strings as per Excel formats) and data. Can these be imported and converted to absolute times during the import process instead of converted to, and output as, date lists?


(If solutions to this problem means that Import and FinancialData internals take date lists and convert to absolute time then I don't really see that as a solution. I am seeking ways to go direct to absolute time.)



Answer



The data in the file test.xls are




03/Jan/2000   45.46
04/Jan/2000 43.92
05/Jan/2000 44.38
06/Jan/2000 42.9
07/Jan/2000 43.46
10/Jan/2000 43.78
11/Jan/2000 42.65
12/Jan/2000 41.26
13/Jan/2000 42.04
14/Jan/2000 43.78


An alternative approach is to exploit the fact that Office documents are zipped collections of XML files. So,


Step 1: rename the source file by adding .zip to the file name: test.xlsx.zip.


Step 2: Import the appropriate xml file in the zip file, extract the data elements and re-format:


 Cases[Import["C:\\ your directory \\test.xlsx.zip", {"ZIP", "xl\\worksheets\\sheet1.xml"}], 
XMLElement["v", {}, {value_}] :> value, Infinity]
// Partition[#, 2] &

This gives:




{{"36528", "45.46"}, {"36529", "43.92"}, {"36530", "44.38"}, {"36531", "42.9"}, {"36532", "43.46"}, {"36535", "43.78"}, {"36536", "42.65"}, {"36537", "41.26"}, {"36538", "42.04"}, {"36539", "43.78"}}



where the first entry in each sublist is Excel's DATEVALUE (serial date number that counts the number of days from 1/1/1900).


Puzzle: I would expect that converting Excel's DATEVALUE to Mathematica's AbsoluteTime (number of seconds from 1/1/1900) would be as simple as multiplying the former by 24*60*60. But doing that with:


  excelDateValues = {"36528", "36529", "36530", "36531", "36532", "36535", "36536", "36537", "36538", "36539"}

and


  DateList /@ (24*60*60*ToExpression@excelDateValues)

gives




{{2000, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0.}, {2000, 1, 6, 0, 0, 0.}, {2000, 1, 7, 0, 0, 0.}, 
{2000, 1, 8, 0, 0, 0.}, {2000, 1, 9, 0, 0, 0.}, {2000, 1, 12, 0, 0, 0.},
{2000, 1, 13, 0, 0, 0.}, {2000, 1, 14, 0, 0, 0.}, {2000, 1, 15, 0, 0, 0.},
{2000, 1, 16, 0, 0, 0.}}

which is off by two days. Hopefully, there is a less naive approach to the get the right conversion factor to go from excel Datevalues to Mma AbsoluteTime so that a modified version of Cases[] above gives the desired result.


Puzzle resolved: Thanks to Mr.Wizard's reference, the historical background to the two-day discrepancy is explained beautifully in Joel Spolsky's great story . So, unless your data does contain dates going back early 1900's for most cases just subtracting 2 from final output dates should be ok. But ... things can get more complicated considering possible excel date system settings and varying defaults accross OSs. (see XL 1900 and 1904 date systems)


EDIT: Import uses the filename extension if no format is provided as the second argument. For zip files it returns the filenames in the zipped archive. For the example case


   Import["C:\\ your directory \\test.xlsx.zip"]


returns



 {"[Content_Types].xml", "_rels\\.rels","xl\\_rels\\workbook.xml.rels", "xl\\workbook.xml", "xl\\styles.xml",  "xl\\worksheets\\sheet1.xml", "xl\\theme\\theme1.xml", "customXml\\item1.xml", "customXml\\_rels\\item1.xml.rels", "customXml\\_rels\\item2.xml.rels", "docProps\\app.xml", "customXml\\itemProps2.xml", "customXml\\item2.xml", "customXml\\itemProps1.xml", "docProps\\core.xml"}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...