Skip to main content

gui construction - Problems with visual update in GUI


Consider the following. When clicking in "Browse" and then choosing a file, the path will remain the original one and won't change to the one of the file I chose:


nb = EvaluationNotebook[];

DynamicModule[
 {path1 = FileNameJoin[{$HomeDirectory, "Desktop", "file.nb"}],
  path2 = FileNameJoin[{$HomeDirectory, "Desktop", "file.xls"}]}, 

 CreateDialog[
  Column[{Row[{InputField[Dynamic[path1], String, Enabled -> False], 
      FileNameSetter[Dynamic[path1], 
       "Open", {"Mathematica Notebook" -> {"*.nb"}}]}], 
    Row[{InputField[Dynamic[path2], String, Enabled -> False], 
      FileNameSetter[Dynamic[path2], 
       "Open", {"Excel files" -> {"*.xls", "*.xlsx"}}]}]}], 
  NotebookEventActions :> {"WindowClose" :> (SetOptions[nb, 
       Visible -> True])}]
]


Answer



The behaviour is indeed inconsistent: CreateDialog uses the option WindowSize -> All, where All (god knows why) causes the unexpected behaviour with dynamic content. See resolution of the problem at the end of the post.


The following even more simple example clearly shows that something fishy is going on: only path2 can be set via the second button but not path1:


DynamicModule[{path1 = "path #1", path2 = "path #2"},
  CreateDialog@Grid@{
     {FileNameSetter[Dynamic@path1, 
       "Open", {"Mathematica Notebook" -> {"*.nb"}}], Dynamic@path1},
     {FileNameSetter[Dynamic@path2, 
       "Open", {"Excel files" -> {"*.xls", "*.xlsx"}}], Dynamic@path2}
     }];


Removing the CreateDialog wrapper causes both FileNameSetters to work as expected, which indicates that it is the special context of the dialog window that causes the erroneous behaviour. Since CreateDialog[expr] is just a specialized CreateWindow[DocumentNotebook[expr]], we have to look at the options CreateDialog uses as defaults for its internal CreateWindow. As it turns out, the blame lies with WindowSize. Compare the behavior of the following two examples where only the value of WindowSize differs.


This is faulty:


DynamicModule[{path1 = "path #1", path2 = "path #2"},
 CreateWindow[DocumentNotebook@Grid@{
     {FileNameSetter[Dynamic@path1, 
       "Open", {"Mathematica Notebook" -> {"*.nb"}}], Dynamic@path1},
     {FileNameSetter[Dynamic@path2, 
       "Open", {"Excel files" -> {"*.xls", "*.xlsx"}}], Dynamic@path2}
     }, WindowSize -> All]]


This works as expected:


DynamicModule[{path1 = "path #1", path2 = "path #2"},
 CreateWindow[DocumentNotebook@Grid@{
     {FileNameSetter[Dynamic@path1, 
       "Open", {"Mathematica Notebook" -> {"*.nb"}}], Dynamic@path1},
     {FileNameSetter[Dynamic@path2, 
       "Open", {"Excel files" -> {"*.xls", "*.xlsx"}}], Dynamic@path2}
     }, WindowSize -> {200, 200}]]


And then I remembered: Strange behavior of CreateDialog in (Dynamic)Module


The options for CreateWindow (to make it look like it is a dialog) are:


{WindowSize -> {200, 200}, Deployed -> True, ShowCellBracket -> False,
 WindowFloating -> False, StyleDefinitions -> "Dialog.nb",
 WindowFrame -> "ModelessDialog"}

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],
Post a Comment
Read more