Skip to main content

graphics - How to get rid of the mesh of a `MeshRegion` in a same pane 


point = {{(2 2^(1/3))/3, (2 2^(1/3))/3, (2 2^(1/3))/
3}, {-((2 2^(1/3))/3), (2 2^(1/3))/3, (2 2^(1/3))/3}, {(
2 2^(1/3))/3, -((2 2^(1/3))/3), (2 2^(1/3))/3}, {(2 2^(1/3))/3, (
2 2^(1/3))/
3, -((2 2^(1/3))/3)}, {-((2 2^(1/3))/3), -((2 2^(1/3))/3), (
2 2^(1/3))/3}, {-((2 2^(1/3))/3), (2 2^(1/3))/

3, -((2 2^(1/3))/3)}, {(2 2^(1/3))/
3, -((2 2^(1/3))/3), -((2 2^(1/3))/3)}, {-((2 2^(1/3))/3), -((
 2 2^(1/3))/3), -((2 2^(1/3))/3)}, {0, 1/2^(2/3), 2^(
1/3)}, {0, -(1/2^(2/3)), 2^(1/3)}, {0, 1/2^(
2/3), -2^(1/3)}, {0, -(1/2^(2/3)), -2^(1/3)}, {1/2^(2/3), 2^(1/3),
 0}, {-(1/2^(2/3)), 2^(1/3), 0}, {1/2^(2/3), -2^(1/3), 
0}, {-(1/2^(2/3)), -2^(1/3), 0}, {2^(1/3), 0, 1/2^(
2/3)}, {-2^(1/3), 0, 1/2^(2/3)}, {2^(1/3), 
0, -(1/2^(2/3))}, {-2^(1/3), 0, -(1/2^(2/3))}};
reg = ConvexHullMesh[point, MeshCellStyle -> {{1, All} -> Red}]


enter image description here


This current method:


poly = MeshPrimitives[ConvexHullMesh[point], 2];
total = Function[part, 
     Select[poly, 
      RegionDistance[InfinitePlane @@ part, RandomPoint[#]] < 
        10^-5 &]] /@ poly // DeleteDuplicatesBy[#, Sort[#] &] &;
g12 = Polygon /@ (#[[
       FindShortestTour[#] // Last]] & /@ (DeleteDuplicates /@ 

       Apply[Sequence, total, {2, 3}])) // 
  Graphics3D[{Yellow, EdgeForm[Red], #}, Boxed -> False] &

enter image description here


Are there more smart method to get rid of the redundant red line?



Answer



Graphics3D[{Yellow, EdgeForm[Red],Polygon@*VertexList@*Graph /@ 
   FindCycle[NearestNeighborGraph[point // N, 3], {5}, All]}]

img



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more