Skip to main content

graphics - Exporting an image so that the PlotRange has a fixed size in the output


I am writing a document that involves a table of plots, of an array of quantities ($f$ and $g$, say) against an array of variables ($x$ and $y$, say), and which I would like to present in the following form:






I have produced this minimal working example via the following Mathematica code,


fraction = 0.54;
var[1] = "x"; var[2] = "y"; var[3] = "x"; var[4] = "y";
fun[1] = "f"; fun[2] = "f"; fun[3] = "g"; fun[4] = "g";
Grid[Partition[#, 2]] &@
Table[
figure[n] = Plot[
x^n

, {x, 0, 1}
, ImageSize -> If[n == 1 || n == 3, fraction 370, (1 - fraction) 370]
, Frame -> True
, FrameLabel -> {var[n], fun[n]}
,,Epilog->{Inset[Text[Evaluate["("<>{"a","b","c","d"}[[n]]<>") "<>
fun[n]<>"=\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\("<>var[n]<>"\), \("<>ToString[n]<>"\)]\)"]],
Scaled[{0.5,0.97}],Scaled[{0.5,1}]]}
, ImagePadding -> {{
If[n == 1 || n == 3, Scaled[0.08], Scaled[0.007]]
, Scaled[0.01]}, {

If[n == 3 || n == 4, Scaled[0.08], Scaled[0.007]]
, Scaled[0.01]}}
]
, {n, 1, 4}];
Table[Export["figure" <> ToString[n] <> ".pdf", figure[n]], {n, 1, 4}]

which then feeds into a simple LaTeX document


\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}

\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.3mm}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\includegraphics[scale=1]{figure1.pdf}&
\includegraphics[scale=1]{figure2.pdf}\\[-2mm]
\includegraphics[scale=1]{figure3.pdf}&
\includegraphics[scale=1]{figure4.pdf}
\end{tabular}
\caption{Figure caption}

\end{figure}
\end{document}



In particular, I want the plots to share scales: I only want to have tick marks and axis labels on the global left and global bottom of the table, because space is at a premium and I want to devote as much space as possible to the plots themselves. This is the reason for the differential use of ImagePadding depending on where in the table each plot sits.


Moreover, I am wedded to the use of scale=1 on the LaTeX figure calls, because I have multiple MaTeX calls on the axis, plot, and tick labels, as well as several other places in the plots, and I want to retain consistency of sizing over all of them. Thus, I want the Exported plots to be produced at the size at which they will be inserted into the LaTeX-produced pdf.


This is a bit problematic, though, because I also want the plot ranges themselves to match up, as exactly as possible, so that the table will be seamless and easier to read. In the code above, this was done by fixing (by hand, and through trial and error) the value of the fraction of the global width that each plot occupies. This mostly works, but it is error-prone and it breaks if there is any sizeable change to the plots, and particularly to the image padding.


This brings me to my question: Is there a way to automate this process? That is, is there a way that I can fix the absolute size, in printer's points, at which the formal PlotRange will be produced within the exported image?



Answer



I don't know if the following addresses all of your issues, but there are 2 things I would try:




  1. ImageSize -> Automatic -> size


This option sets the plot range of the plot to have the ImageSize size.



  1. Charting`ScaledFrameTicks[{Identity, Identity}]


This ticks specification draws tick marks, but no labels.


Using the above, you shouldn't have to worry about tweaking the ImageSize and ImagePadding options. For example:


Grid[{

{
Plot[x, {x,0,1}, Frame->True, ImageSize->Automatic->{170,170/GoldenRatio},
FrameTicks->{{True,True},{Charting`ScaledFrameTicks[{Identity,Identity}],True}},
FrameLabel->{{f,None}, {None, None}}
],
Plot[y^2, {y,0,1}, Frame->True, ImageSize->Automatic->{170,170/GoldenRatio},
FrameTicks->{{Charting`ScaledFrameTicks[{Identity,Identity}],True},{Charting`ScaledFrameTicks[{Identity,Identity}],True}}
]
},
{

Plot[x^3, {x,0,1}, Frame->True, ImageSize->Automatic->{170,170/GoldenRatio},
FrameTicks->{{True,True},{Automatic,True}},
FrameLabel->{{g,None},{x,None}}
],
Plot[y^4, {y,0,1}, Frame->True, ImageSize->Automatic->{170,170/GoldenRatio},
FrameTicks->{{Charting`ScaledFrameTicks[{Identity,Identity}],True},{Automatic,True}},
FrameLabel->{{None,None},{y,None}}
]
}
}]


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...