Skip to main content

plotting - Modular surface of tri-focal Cassini curve ContourPlot3D missing feet


I am wondering why the following fails to cover the surface at points near k=0.


c[z_] := (z + 1) (z - 1) (z + 1 + I);


ContourPlot3D[Abs[c[x + I y]] == k^3, {x, -2.5, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, 
{k, 0, 1.75}, Background -> White, AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "k"}]

Mathematica graphics


Furthermore, when the left hand side is complex expanded and the equation is rearranged with 2xy+k3 on the right, the curve looks significantly different, with one large and one small foot, both touching at zero. Why is that?



Answer



ContourPlot3D is not very good at resolving thin features, because it only knows that the feature exists when one of the sampling points happens to land inside it. In general, one thing you can do is to increase PlotPoints, which improves the plot but takes a very long time.


ContourPlot3D[
 Abs[c[x + I y]] == k^3, {x, -2.5, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {k, 0, 1.75}, 
 Background -> White, AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "k"}, PlotPoints -> 20]


enter image description here


In this particular case, though, your plot is equivalent to k=|c(x+iy)|1/3, so you could just use Plot3D instead. This is much faster because it only has to sample the two-dimensional xy plane rather than the three-dimensional xyk space. Then you can afford to make MaxRecursion quite large and it's still really quick to plot.


Plot3D[Abs[c[x + I y]]^(1/3), {x, -2.5, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, PlotRange -> {0, 1.75},
 Background -> White, AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "k"}, ClippingStyle -> None,
 BoxRatios -> 1, MeshFunctions -> {#1 &, #2 &, #3 &}, MaxRecursion -> 5]

enter image description here


(I've added a few options to make it look like your original plot.)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more