Skip to main content

control systems - On using DiracDelta[t] in OutputResposne in version 10. Different result from version 9


I am baffled by this. I was trying to run same example I had working in version 9.01 and found now I get empty plots.



The example is here . Here is a simplified version of the above. The same exact example produces a plot in version 9.01. But in Version 10, it is empty.


enter image description here


w = 1; z = 0.07;
sys = TransferFunctionModel[w^2/(s^2 + 2 z*w*s + w^2), s];
fun = First@OutputResponse[sys, DiracDelta[t], {t, 0, 20}];
Plot[Evaluate[%], {t, 0, 20}]

I tried to find what is going on, so I asked for analytical solution, in version 10 it says:


w = 1; z = 0.07;
sys = TransferFunctionModel[w^2/(s^2 + 2 z*w*s + w^2), s];

fun = First@OutputResponse[sys, DiracDelta[t], t] // ComplexExpand // Simplify // Chop

Mathematica graphics


In version 9.01:


w = 1; z = 0.07;
sys = TransferFunctionModel[w^2/(s^2 + 2 z*w*s + w^2), s];
fun = First@OutputResponse[sys, DiracDelta[t], t] // ComplexExpand // Simplify // Chop

Mathematica graphics


So in version 10 the solution seems to be reversed. going back in time !



 Plot[Evaluate[fun], {t, -20, 0}]

Mathematica graphics


Any idea what is going on? What changes could have caused this?



Answer



In versions 8 and 9, OutputResponse (and StateResponse) was doing its own processing of DiracDelta, before passing stuff on to NDSolve, etc. This was creating issues as NDSolve and the others were being constantly improved and updated. Now we let the core functions handle the preprocessing, but then we have to deal with a little quirk (aka bug) like this. The behavior you are seeing is just propagating upward from those functions.


eqs[Δ_] := {y[t] + 0.14 y'[t] + y''[t] == DiracDelta[t - Δ], y[0] == 0, y'[0] == 0};

Δ = {0, 0.001};
y[t] /. DSolve[eqs[#], y[t], t] & /@ Δ;

Plot[%, {t, -20, 20}, PlotRange -> All, PlotLegends -> Δ]

enter image description here


y[t] /. NDSolve[eqs[#], y[t], {t, 0, 20}] & /@ Δ;
Plot[%, {t, 0, 20}, PlotLegends -> Δ]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...