Skip to main content

graphics - Arranging connector lines


Heike gave an absolutely wonderful answer to my question about arranging subplots around a main plot and including connector lines. This is the result:


Mathematica graphics


Starting from Heike's answer, what is the best order to arrange the subplots in so the connector lines are as easy to follow / as aesthetically arranged as possible?


To have something concrete to test with, let's say we have 12 points in the unit square. These are the starting points of the lines.


start = RandomReal[1, {12, 2}];

The set of endpoints is fixed (due to the subplot positions):


end = With[{dx = 0.1, dy = 0.1}, 

{{-dx, 1 + dy}, {.25 - dx/4, 1 + dy}, {.75 + dx/4, 1 + dy},
{1 + dx, 1 + dy}, {1 + dx, .75 + dy/4}, {1 + dx, .25 - dx/4},
{1 + dx, -dy}, {.75 + dx/4, -dy}, {.25 - dx/4, -dy},
{-dx, -dy}, {-dx, .25 - dy/4}, {-dx, .75 + dy/4}}];

Then the plot will look similar to this:


Graphics[{
FaceForm[Lighter@Orange], Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}],
Line@Transpose[{start, end}],
AbsolutePointSize[18], Lighter@Orange, Point[end],

Black, MapThread[Text, {Range[12], end}]},
Frame -> True, FrameTicks -> None, PlotRange -> {{-.2, 1.2}, {-.2, 1.2}}]

Mathematica graphics


Given the starting points in the orange square, how can we automatically reorder the labelled endpoints so the lines cross as little as possible (or generally: the figure looks as good as possible)?


Please try to make your answers complete, with a sample output figure using the code above. When it is not possible to avoid that the lines cross, what the "best" arrangement is is admittedly somewhat subjective.




Note: This is a question that I thought others would be interested in too. It is not a practical problem I am facing (I ordered the subplots manually in my figure), but of course if there are any good solutions, I will use them. I will be working on solutions as well.


Note 2: Given two lists, l1 and l2, containing the same elements in different orders, the permutation that re-orders l1 to l2 is Part[Ordering[l1], Ordering@Ordering[l2]]. This may be useful for reordering points.



Answer




This method tries to find a minimum of the total length of all connecting lines by repeatedly swapping the endpoints of pairs of connecting lines if that reduces the total length of those two connecting lines until the list of edges doesn't change anymore. From the triangle inequality this then also guarantees that no two connecting lines will intersect each other.


start = RandomReal[1, {12, 2}];
end = With[{dx = 0.1, dy = 0.1},
{{-dx, 1 + dy}, {.25 - dx/4, 1 + dy}, {.75 + dx/4, 1 + dy},
{1 + dx, 1 + dy}, {1 + dx, .75 + dy/4}, {1 + dx, .25 - dx/4},
{1 + dx, -dy}, {.75 + dx/4, -dy}, {.25 - dx/4, -dy},
{-dx, -dy}, {-dx, .25 - dy/4}, {-dx, .75 + dy/4}}];

combis = Subsets[Range[12], {2}];
length[{b_, e_}] := EuclideanDistance[start[[b]], end[[e]]]


newedges = Transpose[{Range[12], Range[12]}];
FixedPoint[
Do[p = {#[[{1, 4}]], #[[{3, 2}]]} &@Flatten[newedges[[c]]];
If[Total[length /@ p] < Total[length /@ newedges[[c]]],
newedges[[c]] = p],
{c, combis}] &, newedges, 10]

Then the before picture is this:


Mathematica graphics



and the after picture is:


Graphics[{FaceForm[Lighter@Orange], 
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}],
Line@Transpose[{start[[newedges[[All, 1]]]],
end[[newedges[[All, 2]]]]}], AbsolutePointSize[18],
Lighter@Orange, Point[end[[newedges[[All, 2]]]]], Black,
MapThread[Text, {Range[12], end[[newedges[[All, 2]]]]}]},
Frame -> True, FrameTicks -> None,
PlotRange -> {{-.2, 1.2}, {-.2, 1.2}}]


Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?