Skip to main content

differential equations - Need help in plotting a function with two variables in ODE


The solution of this ODE was given in this link


Here I am asking, if L is a function of tot, g, Z and tot depends on Z and g, which means I need to solve the ODE for each value of Z and g to get tot and then pass it to L function, after that Plot L.

I am not sure should I use ContourPlot or somethings els. Help please.


p[Z0_, g0_, k0_, R0_] := 
  Block[{Z = Z0, 
         g = Rationalize[g0, 0],
         k2 = Rationalize[k0, 0],
         ϵ = 10^-4, 
         R = Rationalize[R0, 0]},
    ps = 
      ParametricNDSolveValue[
        {y''[r] + 2 y'[r]/r == k2 Sinh[y[r]], 

         y[ϵ] == y0, y'[ϵ] == 0, 
         WhenEvent[r == 1, y'[r] -> y'[r] + Z g]}, 
        {y, y'}, {r, ϵ, R}, {y0}, 
        Method -> "StiffnessSwitching", 
        WorkingPrecision -> 20];

sol = FindRoot[Last[ps[y0]][R], {y0, -1}, Evaluated -> False][[1, 2]];       
tot = 4 π sol NIntegrate[r^2  Exp[-First[ps[sol]][r]], {r, 0, R}];
L= Z/g*tot;


ContourPlot[L, {g, 0.02, 0.06}, {Z, 500, 800}]]

Quiet[
  Table[p[Z, g, 0.0002, 1.5], {g, 0.02, 0.06, .02},{Z, 500, 800, 200}]]

Answer



The desired contour plot can be obtained as follows. Begin with a slight modification to the code in the question.


p[Z0_, g0_, k0_, R0_] := Block[{Z = Z0, 
  g = Rationalize[g0, 0], k2 = Rationalize[k0, 0], ϵ = 10^-4, R = Rationalize[R0, 0]}, 
  ps = ParametricNDSolveValue[{y''[r] + 2 y'[r]/r == k2 Sinh[y[r]], y[ϵ] == y0, y'[ϵ] == 0, 
    WhenEvent[r == 1, y'[r] -> y'[r] + Z g]}, {y, y'[R]}, {r, ϵ], R}, {y0}, 

    Method -> "StiffnessSwitching", WorkingPrecision -> 20];
  sol = FindRoot[Last[ps[y0]], {y0, -1}, Evaluated -> False][[1, 2]];
  tot = 4 π sol NIntegrate[r^2 Exp[-First[ps[sol]][r]], {r, ϵ, R}];
  L = Z/g*tot]

Specifically, {y, y'} is replaced by {y, y'[R]} to save a bit of time, because the value of y' is needed only at r = R; a corresponding change is made in the first argument of FindRoot; the lower bound of NIntegrate is set to ϵ, because ps is undefined for smaller values of r; and ContourPlot is removed from within the definition of p.


The desired contour plot then is


ContourPlot[Quiet[p[Z, g, 0.0002, 1.5]], {g, 0.02, 0.06}, {Z, 500, 800}, 
    PlotPoints -> {5, 4}, MaxRecursion -> 1, PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
    FrameLabel -> {g, Z}, ImageSize -> Large, LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]


enter image description here


which takes about two minutes on my computer. The plotting can, however, be parallelized with equal resolution using


DistributeDefinitions[p];
tab = ParallelTable[Quiet[p[Z, g, 0.0002, 1.5]], {Z, 500, 800, 50}, {g, 0.02, 0.06, .005}];
ListContourPlot[tab, DataRange -> {{.02, .06}, {500, 800}}, PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
    FrameLabel -> {g, Z}, ImageSize -> Large, LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]

which produces the same plot in 37 seconds. (My computer has six processors.) Finally, the table requested in the question is


Table[Quiet[p[Z, g, 0.0002, 1.5]], {g, 0.02, 0.06, .02}, {Z, 500, 800, 200}]

(* {{-3.41941*10^11, -6.80714*10^11}, {-3.51627*10^11, -6.9574*10^11}, 
    {-3.55499*10^11, -7.0144*10^11}} *)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...
Post a Comment
Read more

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...
Post a Comment
Read more