Skip to main content

performance tuning - How to speed up the plotting of B-spline curve?


Three months ago, I asked a quesion about B-Spline basis function here, Today, I used this function to plot B-spline curve.


The definition of $N_{i,p}$


  NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),u_] /;
i <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Piecewise[
{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u < knots[[i + 2]]},
{0, u < knots[[i + 1]] || u >= knots[[i + 2]]}}]


coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] /; knots[[i]] == knots[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] := (u - knots[[i]])/(knots[[j]] - knots[[i]])

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),
u_] /;p > 0 && i + p <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Module[{init, res},
init = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, knots, u], {j, i, i + p}];
res = First@
Nest[

Dot @@@
(Thread@
{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = p + 2 - Length@#},
Table[
{coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, knots],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, knots]}, {k, i, i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &,
init, p]
]




The definition of B-Spline curve


$$\overset{\rightharpoonup }{C}(u)=\sum _{i=0}^n N_{i,p}(u) \overset{\rightharpoonup }{P}_i \text{ }\qquad (a\leq u\leq b)$$


where, $P_i$ is the control point, the $N_ {i, p} (u)$ are the pth - degree Bspline basis functions defined on the nonperiodic (and nonuniform) knot vector


knots= $\{\underbrace {a,\cdots ,a}_{p+1},u_{p+1},\cdots u_{m-p-1},\underbrace {b,\cdots,b}_{p+1}\}$




Trail 1


(Update) with george2079's solution


 BSplinePlot1[pts : {{_, _} ..}, knots_, opts : OptionsPattern[Plot]] :=
Module[{p = Length@First@Split[knots] - 1, a, b},

{a, b} = {First[knots], Last[knots]};
ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@
Simplify@
Total@
MapIndexed[
NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &, pts], {u, a, b}, opts
]
]


Test1


 pts3 = {{1, 6}, {2, 8}, {3, 6}, {4, 12}, {7, 11}, {9, 3}, {12, 7}, {14, 5}, {15, 8}, {17, 8}};
knots3= {0, 0, 0, 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8, 1, 1, 1};

BSplinePlot1[pts3, knots3, ImageSize -> 600]


enter image description here



 Graphics[{BSplineCurve[pts, SplineKnots -> knots], Green, Line[pts], 

Red, Point[pts]}] // AbsoluteTiming


enter image description here





Update




  • Is there any method to speed up the calculation of NBSPline?



    See george2079's solution and my answer




  • How to deal with the problem of discontinuity shown in the first graph?


    Add the option PlotPoints





Answer



The plot is sped up substantially if you use Evaluate:


  ParametricPlot[

Evaluate[ Total@MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &, pts]] ,
{u, a, b}, opts]

(I only looked a trial 1 , but I think your other try have the same issue )


It helps a little more if you remove the Simplify from NBSpline and simplify the whole thing:


 ParametricPlot[
Evaluate[Total@
MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &, pts] //
Simplify], {u, a, b}, opts]


Your original form is a sum of piecewise expressions. The outer Simplify condenses the whole thing into a single piecewise.


The gaps seem to relate the nature of the discontinuity in derivatives of the bspline w/ respect to its parameter at the knots, which evidently fools Parametric Plot into thinking there is an actual discontinuity.


The gaps close with PlotPoints -> 1000 , though if you look at the graphics produced you'll see you still have separate Lines for each portion. I don't think there is anything to do about that except not use ParametricPlot.


You might try doing away with ParametricPlot and doing Graphics@Line@Table .., which may speed it up as well.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...