Skip to main content

performance tuning - How to speed up the plotting of B-spline curve?


Three months ago, I asked a quesion about B-Spline basis function here, Today, I used this function to plot B-spline curve.


The definition of $N_{i,p}$


  NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),u_] /;
i <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Piecewise[
{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u < knots[[i + 2]]},
{0, u < knots[[i + 1]] || u >= knots[[i + 2]]}}]


coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] /; knots[[i]] == knots[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] := (u - knots[[i]])/(knots[[j]] - knots[[i]])

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),
u_] /;p > 0 && i + p <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Module[{init, res},
init = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, knots, u], {j, i, i + p}];
res = First@
Nest[

Dot @@@
(Thread@
{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = p + 2 - Length@#},
Table[
{coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, knots],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, knots]}, {k, i, i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &,
init, p]
]




The definition of B-Spline curve


$$\overset{\rightharpoonup }{C}(u)=\sum _{i=0}^n N_{i,p}(u) \overset{\rightharpoonup }{P}_i \text{ }\qquad (a\leq u\leq b)$$


where, $P_i$ is the control point, the $N_ {i, p} (u)$ are the pth - degree Bspline basis functions defined on the nonperiodic (and nonuniform) knot vector


knots= $\{\underbrace {a,\cdots ,a}_{p+1},u_{p+1},\cdots u_{m-p-1},\underbrace {b,\cdots,b}_{p+1}\}$




Trail 1


(Update) with george2079's solution


 BSplinePlot1[pts : {{_, _} ..}, knots_, opts : OptionsPattern[Plot]] :=
Module[{p = Length@First@Split[knots] - 1, a, b},

{a, b} = {First[knots], Last[knots]};
ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@
Simplify@
Total@
MapIndexed[
NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &, pts], {u, a, b}, opts
]
]


Test1


 pts3 = {{1, 6}, {2, 8}, {3, 6}, {4, 12}, {7, 11}, {9, 3}, {12, 7}, {14, 5}, {15, 8}, {17, 8}};
knots3= {0, 0, 0, 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8, 1, 1, 1};

BSplinePlot1[pts3, knots3, ImageSize -> 600]


enter image description here



 Graphics[{BSplineCurve[pts, SplineKnots -> knots], Green, Line[pts], 

Red, Point[pts]}] // AbsoluteTiming


enter image description here





Update




  • Is there any method to speed up the calculation of NBSPline?



    See george2079's solution and my answer




  • How to deal with the problem of discontinuity shown in the first graph?


    Add the option PlotPoints





Answer



The plot is sped up substantially if you use Evaluate:


  ParametricPlot[

Evaluate[ Total@MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &, pts]] ,
{u, a, b}, opts]

(I only looked a trial 1 , but I think your other try have the same issue )


It helps a little more if you remove the Simplify from NBSpline and simplify the whole thing:


 ParametricPlot[
Evaluate[Total@
MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &, pts] //
Simplify], {u, a, b}, opts]


Your original form is a sum of piecewise expressions. The outer Simplify condenses the whole thing into a single piecewise.


The gaps seem to relate the nature of the discontinuity in derivatives of the bspline w/ respect to its parameter at the knots, which evidently fools Parametric Plot into thinking there is an actual discontinuity.


The gaps close with PlotPoints -> 1000 , though if you look at the graphics produced you'll see you still have separate Lines for each portion. I don't think there is anything to do about that except not use ParametricPlot.


You might try doing away with ParametricPlot and doing Graphics@Line@Table .., which may speed it up as well.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...