Skip to main content

differential equations - Numerical solution of IVP for linear ODE with variable coefficient runs wild soon


Cross posted in scicomp.SE.


A friend of mine showed me this initial value problem (IVP) for a linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) with variable coefficient:



$$y''(x)=\left(x^2-1\right) y(x)$$$$y(0)=1$$$$y'(0)=0$$


Seems to be a simple one, right? Actually it can be solved analytically by DSolve:


asol = DSolve[{y''[x] == (x^2 - 1) y[x], y[0] == 1, y'[0] == 0}, y[x], x]


{{y[x] -> E^(-(x^2/2))}}

But its numerical solution given by NDSolve runs wild very fast:


l = 10;
nsol = NDSolve[{y''[x] == (x^2 - 1) y[x], y[0] == 1, y'[0] == 0},

y, {x, 0, l}]; // AbsoluteTiming
Manipulate[Plot[y[x] /. nsol // Evaluate, {x, 0, l2},
PlotRange -> {{0, 7}, {-10, 1}}], {l2, 1/10, 7}]


{0.015600, Null}

enter image description here


How to resolve the problem?


Well, actually I found two solution for this problem but one is time-consuming and the other is limited so I'm not quite satisfied.



Solution 1


A higher WorkingPrecision will help:


l = 10;
nsol = NDSolve[{y''[x] == (x^2 - 1) y[x], y[0] == 1, y'[0] == 0},
y, {x, 0, l}, WorkingPrecision -> 50]; // AbsoluteTiming
Plot[y[x] /. nsol, {x, 0, l}, PlotRange -> All]


{2.857000, Null}


enter image description here


Nonetheless, this solution is slow, and will need a higher WorkingPrecision and be even slower when l gets larger.


Solution 2


Noticing the analytic solution involves a Exp, given the experience that Exp often causes trouble in numerical calculation, the transformation $y(x)=e^{z(x)}$ is used:


l = 50;
rule = y -> (Exp[z@#] &);

(* z[0] == 0 is manually substituted because it seems that
NDSolveValue has some difficulty in understanding y[0] == 1 /. rule *)
nsol = NDSolveValue[{y''[x] == (x^2 - 1) y[x], z[0] == 0, y'[0] == 0} /. rule,

z, {x, 0, l}]; // AbsoluteTiming
Plot[Exp@nsol[x], {x, 0, l}, PlotRange -> All]


 {0.013000, Null}

enter image description here


However, as mentioned above, this solution is limited, I wouldn't have thought it out if I was unaware of the analytic solution, and I really doubt if this method can be extended: I guess there's a sort of problem behind this specific example, once it's solved, more complicated problem might be solved too, for example this and this.


I'd appreciate if anyone can give an in-depth explanation for the problem or find a better solution.



Answer




I think this shows what the problem is. The ODE is inherently numerically unstable as any deviation from the exact solution goes to ±∞.


asol = DSolve[{y''[x] == (x^2 - 1) y[x], y[0] == 1, y'[0] == p}, y[x], x];
Manipulate[
Plot[y[x] /. asol /. {{p -> 0}, {p -> 10^(-error)}, {p -> -10^(-error)}} // Evaluate,
{x, 0, 7}, PlotRange -> 2],
{error, 1, 10, Appearance -> "Labeled"}]

Mathematica graphics




Update - Possible workaround



Aside from increasing the working precision and increasing the "DifferenceOrder", one can try the approach I took toward the Airy equation in my answer to how to solve ODE with boundary at infinity, which is similar both in form and in having a single solution (for a given initial value for y[0]) that does not diverge to infinity. For that approach, we have to set up the problem as a boundary-value problem on $[0, \infty)$ instead of an initial-value problem. One can see from the equation that $y = 0$ is a solution, and that for some $x > 1$, if $y$, $y'$ are both positive or both negative, the solution diverges. Thus if a solution crosses the $x$-axis, it will diverge. And if $y$ is positive (negative) and reaches a local minimum (maximum resp.), then $y$ will diverge. Further $y$ cannot approach a finite nonzero value because $|y''|$ will be bounded away from $0$. One might surmise that there is a solution that starts at $y = 1$ and approaches $y = 0$. (It's harder to know that this will have the initial condition $y' = 0$, but I suppose one could check that afterwards. If it doesn't satisfy it, then I suppose the IVP actually has a diverging solution and the straightforward NDSolve solution should be used.)


First we transform the differential equation with the substitutions $x = \tan t$ and $u(t) = y(\tan t)$ to transform $[0,\infty)$ to $[0,\pi/2]$. (You might want to evaluate the NestList separately if you cannot see what it does.)


eqn = (-(x[t]^2 - 1) y[x[t]]
+ D[D[y[x[t]], t]/D[x[t], t], t]/D[x[t], t]) x'[t]^3 == 0 /.
x -> Tan;
bvp = {eqn, u[0] == 1, u[Pi/2] == 0} /.
Solve[NestList[D[#, t] &, u[t] == y[Tan[t]], 2],
{y''[Tan[t]], y'[Tan[t]], y[Tan[t]]}];

femsol = y -> (u[ArcTan[#]] &) /.

First@NDSolve[bvp, u, {t, 0, Pi/2},
Method -> {"FiniteElement", "MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.01}}]

Plot[y[x] /. femsol // Evaluate, {x, 0, 7}]

Mathematica graphics


Comparison with the exact solution:


Plot[Exp[-x^2/2] - (y[x] /. femsol) // Evaluate, {x, 0, 7}, PlotRange -> All]

Mathematica graphics



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...