Skip to main content

replacement - Why does Mathematica not replace the derivative of $theta$1'[t]?


I want to know the velocity of point $p$, given that I know the coordinate.


$p_x=L_1\cos(\theta1)+L_2\cos(\theta1+\theta2)$


I calculate $\frac{dp_x}{dt}$ to achieve the velocity of point $p$ about the $x$ coordinate. My trial as below:


px[t] = L1 Cos[θ1[t]] + L2 Cos[θ1[t] + θ2[t]];

Now I'd like to give the variable some value, $\theta_1=t^2,\theta_2=t^3,L_1=2,L_2=3$


D[px[t], t] /. {θ1[t] -> t^2, θ2[t] -> t^3, L1 -> 2, L2 -> 3}

However,Mathematica gives the result:




-2 Sin[t^2] [θ1'[t] - 3 Sin[t^2 + t^3] ([θ1'[t] + [θ2'[t])

It doesn't evaluate \[Theta]1]'[t] and \[Theta]1'[t] to $2t ,3t^2$, respectively.


So I use the command FullForm


θ1[t] // FullForm


Derivative[1][θ1][t]


So my question is why is it that Mathematica cannot do the full evaluation and how to fix it?


enter image description here



Answer



If you initially want to be able to work with the derivative of p[t] in a form that still contains θ1, θ2 in unevaluated form, then it may be useful to do something like this:


Clear[L1, L2, θ1, θ2, t];
px[t_] = L1 Cos[θ1[t]] + L2 Cos[θ1[t] + θ2[t]]

(* ==> L1 Cos[θ1[t]] + L2 Cos[θ1[t] + θ2[t]] *)

pDerivative = D[px[t], t]


(*
==> -L1 Sin[θ1[t]] Derivative[1][θ1][t] -
L2 Sin[θ1[t] + θ2[t]] (Derivative[1][θ1][t] +
Derivative[1][θ2][t])
*)

So this is where you were in your question, and the derivative has been done while keeping the functions θ1[t] and θ2[t] unspecified.


Say you want to replace them by a specific form now.


It can be done using a replacement rule that directly inserts a function as follows:



pDerivative /. {θ1 -> (#^2 &), θ2 -> (#^3 &), 
L1 -> 2, L2 -> 3}

(* ==> -4 t Sin[t^2] - 3 (2 t + 3 t^2) Sin[t^2 + t^3] *)

But this is less readable than simply doing it by adding a definition for the functions θ1[t] and θ2[t] before the next evaluation of pDerivative:


Clear[θ1, θ2];
θ1[t_] := t^2;
θ2[t_] := t^3;


pDerivative /. {L1 -> 2, L2 -> 3}

(* ==> -4 t Sin[t^2] - 3 (2 t + 3 t^2) Sin[t^2 + t^3] *)

So here pDerivative used the new definitions without you having to explicitly add replacement rules (it did that for you, internally). If you then want to get back to the general form, just use Clear as I did above to erase the definitions for θ1[t] and θ2[t].


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...