finite element method - how to create a FEM mesh with "RegionPlot" where the sample points are a function of the position

I need to resolve the diffusion equation in a domain with circular sources (holes).

I've tried defining the whole region with holes but the result is very mesh-dependent and not symmetric, so at the moment I'm imposing the symmetry myself by only solving 1/4th of the system.

cords = Table[{i, 0}, {i, {0, 5}}];
Ω = Apply[And, Norm[{x, y} - #]^2 > 1 & /@ cords]

mesh2 = ToElementMesh[ 
   ImplicitRegion[
    And[x > 0 && 
      y > 0 && ( x - 2)^2 + y^2 <= 900, Ω], {x, y}], 
   "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> .5, "ImproveBoundaryPosition" -> False,

    "MaxCellMeasure" -> 10, 
   "BoundaryMeshGenerator" -> {"RegionPlot", 
     "SamplePoints" -> 300}];

This looks like this:

Having so many sample points makes the mesh creation really slow, so I would like to have a way to make the resolution position-dependent, having more resolution on the region plot near the centre and less in the outer border.

EDIT:

The problem I have is that I need to go to relatively large regions, and if I use the mesh refining option as user21 recommends, I end up with something like this:

A coarse approximation to the solution is two logarithmic decays from the centre of each particle, so I'd like the resolution of the boundary to go like that.

EDIT2:

somebody should have told me, "don't try FEM in V10.0", most of the other problems I was having disappeared after updating.

Not only the MeshRefinementFunction works as expected in 10.3 but also the solution is much more symmetric and continuous for the cases I'm looking at. I don't think it's only because the mesh is better made in the new version, seems like a more robust solver, at least from the user side of it.

Despite "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" not accepting a function of position, the MeshRefinementFunction can be used to refine wherever one wants to. In my case I'm looking at something like this:

MeshRefinementFunction -> 
 Function[{vertices, area}, 
  area > 0.0125 (0.1 + 
      If[Norm[Mean[vertices] - {2.5, 0}] < 5, 4, 
       4 + Norm[Mean[vertices] - {2.5, 0}]^2])

Which is pretty much exactly what I wanted to achieve when i posed the question. Thanks user21!

Update

The problem seems to persist in mma 11, at least in my mac.

Even thought the refinement function is quite fine:

Answer

You could use:

Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]

ToElementMesh[
  RegionDifference[
   RegionDifference[Disk[{0, 0}, 1, {0, \[Pi]/2}], 
    Disk[{0, 0}, 1/25]], Disk[{3/10, 0}, 1/25]], 
  MeshRefinementFunction -> 
   Function[{vertices, area}, 
    area > 0.0005 (0.1 + 2 Norm[Mean[vertices]])]]["Wireframe"]

For a larger domain:

Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
mesh = ToElementMesh[
   RegionDifference[
    RegionDifference[Disk[{0, 0}, 5, {0, \[Pi]/2}], 
     Disk[{0, 0}, 1/25]], Disk[{3/10, 0}, 1/25]], 
   MeshRefinementFunction -> 
    Function[{vertices, area}, 
     area > 0.0005 (0.1 + Norm[Mean[vertices]])]];
mesh["Wireframe"[PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1}, {-0.1, 1}}]]