Skip to main content

How to apply a function to a list of tuples


trialList = {{0, 24.701}, {1, 24.69}, {2, 24.733}};
f[x_] := x + 1;

I would like to apply the function f to only the second element of each tuple. How is this done?


The actual list is 16,000 entries long. How do I iterate over the whole list applying the function to only the second entry of each tuple? I tried the following, but it does not do what I want:


{trialList[[1]], f[trialList[[2]]]} & @@@ trialList

Answer



If you need to worry about execution speed, then there's a better alternative, using Transpose. First I'll list the timings for the solutions in the other answers. For that purpose, I create a trialList with 160000 random entries, and in the tests I suppress the output to avoid huge output lists:


trialList = RandomReal[{-1, 1}, {160000, 2}];

f[x_] := x + 1

Timing[{#1, f[#2]} & @@@ trialList;]


{0.326740, Null}



Timing[MapAt[f, trialList, {;; , 2}];]



{0.271610, Null}



Timing[trialList[[All, 2]] = f /@ trialList[[All, 2]];]


{0.207944, Null}



Timing[trialList /. {a_, b_} :> {a, f[b]};]



{0.290535, Null}



Here is my proposal:


Timing[Transpose[{#1, Thread[f[#2]]} & @@ Transpose[trialList]];]


{0.053719, Null}



It's 4 to 6 times faster. The right-most Transpose converts the trialList into a list with only two entries, each of which has 160000 elements. The first list contains all the first members of the original tuples, and the second list the second members. The @@ to the left of Transpose says to Apply to this list a function which is {#1, Thread[f[#2]]} &. It has two formal arguments #1 and #2, corresponding to the two large lists. Only the second argument is modified by Threading your function f over it (i.e., applying it to all the elements of the list #2). The result is two lists, of which only the second differs from the original. By doing another Transpose we get the original tuple structure back.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...