Skip to main content

formatting - User-defined usage message template; removing repeated text


In Mathematica 9.0.1, I want to write a user-defined template for a function that I wrote: myfunc


Remove[myfunc]

myfunc::usage = "myfunc[x,y,z] is a function.
                 myfunc[x,y,z,w] is another function."

with the result:


User-defined template for myfunc


As you can see, within the description myfunc is (in my opinion) unnecessarily repeated. In fact, templates for built-in functions do not behave that way. For example, look at the template for the Integrate function:


Build-int template for Integrate


The function name Integrate is not repeated in the description. How do I tell Mathematica not to repeat the name of the function inside the description?



Answer



The built-in function templates displayed by the Input Assistant when Shift+Ctrl+K-ing the symbol name are NOT drawn from either




  • the package file that holds the symbol. Check and edit e.g. Calendar`DaysPlus in $InstallationDirectory\AddOns\Packages\Calendar\Calendar.m. It has one simple usage though the Input Assistant shows two.

  • the usage file: $InstallationDirectory\SystemFiles\Kernel\TextResources\English\Usage.m. It does contain the multiple usage messages for e.g. Calendar`DaysPlus or Integrate, but editing them will only change ?f and Message[f::usage] prints, but not the Input Assistant templates.


The usage messages in Usage.m are probably programmatically created from the same source during initialization that is used to format the templates. This source is in v9 (before, it was FunctionInformation.m):


file = ToFileName[{$InstallationDirectory, "SystemFiles", "Kernel", "TextResources", 
            CurrentValue["Language"]}, "FunctionInformation2.m"]

The file is read when the FrontEnd initializes (at line 376 in GetFEKernelInit.tr):


ToFileName[{$InstallationDirectory, "SystemFiles", "FrontEnd", "TextResources"},

            "GetFEKernelInit.tr"]

While "FunctionInformation2.m" is compressed, it is easy to create a wrapper that makes it readable. Here I only print the information on System` symbols (and omit package symbols that form the first part of data). Warning: the list is huge, 2871 symbols are printed.


format[list_List] := OpenerView[{list[[1]], Column@{
      "ArgumentsPattern" -> list[[2]],
      "Help" -> If[list[[3]] =!= None, Panel@Column[
          MapThread[Row[{##}, " "] &, {DisplayForm /@ list[[3]], 
            DisplayForm /@ list[[4]]}], Alignment -> Left]],
      "Options" -> If[Length@list > 4, list[[5]], ""],
      "LocalVariables" -> If[Length@list > 5, list[[6]], ""]

      }}];

data = Uncompress@Get@file;
format /@ Last@Last@data // Column

enter image description here


The structure is: first symbols without options, then symbols with options, then symbols with options and available "LocalVariables" specification. What you are looking for is the list[[4]] part, that lists the textual part of each line of help (while list[[3]] lists the formula part for each line).


Unfortunately, I don't see any easy ways to add custom syntax information/template to "FunctionInformation2.m" in the way you would like it to be. It's a pity WRI does not allow users to manipulate the Input Assistant in a more usable fashion.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...
Post a Comment
Read more

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...
Post a Comment
Read more