Skip to main content

vector calculus - How to make Jacobian automatically in Mathematica


If we have two vectors, $a$ and $b$, how can I make Jacobian matrix automatically in Mathematica?


$$ a=\left( \begin{array}{c} x_1^3+2x_2^2 \\ 3x_1^4+7x_2 \end{array} \right);b=\left( \begin{array}{c} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{array} \right);J=\left( \begin{array}{cc} \frac{\partial \left(x_1^3+2x_2^2\right)}{\partial x_1} & \frac{\partial \left(x_1^3+2x_2^2\right)}{\partial x_2} \\ \frac{\partial \left(3x_1^4+7x_2\right)}{\partial x_1} & \frac{\partial \left(3x_1^4+7x_2\right)}{\partial x_2} \end{array} \right); $$



Answer



The easiest way to get the Jacobian is


D[a,{b}]


To get the format of a matrix, you would do MatrixForm[D[f, {x}], or D[f, {x}]//MatrixForm, as the comment by azdahak says.


There is no special matrix type in MMA - it's internally always stored as a list of lists.


Edit


Since this question is partly about the format of the matrix and its elements, I thought it's worth adding a definition that makes calculus output look prettier, and in the case of the Jacobian lets you write symbolic matrices like this:



$\left( \begin{array}{cc} \frac{\partial f_{\text{x}}}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial f_{\text{x}}}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial f_{\text{y}}}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial f_{\text{y}}}{\partial y} \\ \end{array} \right)$



The definition was initially posted as a comment on the Wolfram Blog:


Derivative /: 

MakeBoxes[Derivative[α__][f1_][vars__Symbol],
TraditionalForm] :=
Module[{bb, dd, sp},
MakeBoxes[dd, _] ^=
If[Length[{α}] == 1, "\[DifferentialD]", "\[PartialD]"];
MakeBoxes[sp, _] ^= "\[ThinSpace]";
bb /: MakeBoxes[bb[x__], _] := RowBox[Map[ToBoxes[#] &, {x}]];
FractionBox[ToBoxes[bb[dd^Plus[α], f1]],
ToBoxes[Apply[bb,
Riffle[Map[bb[dd, #] &,

Select[({vars}^{α}), (# =!= 1 &)]], sp]
]
]
]
]

With this, you can get the above matrix form with traditional partial derivatives like this:


First define the vector components with subscripts as is conventional. To avoid confusion between subscripts and variable names, use strings for the subscripts:


fVector = Array[Subscript[f, {"x", "y"}[[#]]][x, y] &, 2]


Then form the Jacobian and display it in TraditionalForm:


D[fVector, {{x, y}}] // MatrixForm // TraditionalForm

The result is as shown above.


Edit


In this answer to How to make traditional output for derivatives I posted a newer version of the derivative formatting that contains an InterpretationFunction which allows you to evaluate the derivatives despite their condensed displayed form.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?