Skip to main content

list manipulation - Replace elements of a matrix with zeros using another matrix


I have a matrix Mat1 whos columns are ordered as :


Col = Flatten[Outer[{#2, #1} &, {0, 1}, Delete[Range[-2, 2, 1], 3]], 1]

and the rows are ordered as:


Rows = Flatten[Outer[{#1, #2} &, Delete[Range[-1, 1, 1], 2], Delete[Range[-1, 1, 1], 2]], 1]

The matrix is given as:


Mat1 = Outer[f[Flatten[{#1, #2}]] &, Col, Rows, 1]



$$ \left( \begin{array}{cccc} f(\{-2,0,-1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,1\}) \\f(\{-1,0,-1,-1\}) & f(\{-1,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{-1,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{-1,0,1,1\}) \\f(\{1,0,-1,-1\}) & f(\{1,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,1\}) \\f(\{2,0,-1,-1\}) & f(\{2,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{2,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{2,0,1,1\}) \\ f(\{-2,1,-1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{-2,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,1,1,1\}) \\ f(\{-1,1,-1,-1\}) & f(\{-1,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{-1,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{-1,1,1,1\}) \\ f(\{1,1,-1,-1\}) & f(\{1,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{1,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{1,1,1,1\}) \\ f(\{2,1,-1,-1\}) & f(\{2,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,1\}) \end{array} \right)$$



Another matrix Mat2 with a fewer elements is given as:


Mat2 = Outer[f[Flatten[{#1 , #2}]] &, {{-2, 0}, {1, 0}, {2, 1}}, {{-1, 1}, {1, -1}, {1, 1}}, 1]


$$\left( \begin{array}{ccc} f(\{-2,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,1\}) \\ f(\{1,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,1\}) \\ f(\{2,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,1\}) \end{array} \right)$$




I want to make all the elements of the first matrix (Mat1) equal to zero that are not same as elements of Mat2. This will create a kind of a sparse matrix like:



$$\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & f(\{-2,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,1\}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & f(\{1,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,1\}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & f(\{2,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,1\}) \end{array} \right)$$



How can I do this? (and for any general Range of col and Rows)


Edit: Building Mat1 with Outer for a large list of Rows and Col causes my system to hang and removes all variables from Mathematica. Outer carries out the arrangement of the elements at the positions I need in the matrix but it doesn't work for very big dimensions. I am only interested in the final sparse matrix with the elements at the positions dictated by the list of Rows and Col. Is there any way to get the final matrix by somehow using Rows and Col without the need to build Mat1?.



Answer



Update: An approach to use Col, Rows and the indices used to create Mat2 to get the desired sparse array without creating Mat1:


c2 = {{-2, 0}, {1, 0}, {2, 1}};
r2 = {{-1, 1}, {1, -1}, {1, 1}};

positions = Tuples[{Flatten@Position[Col, #]& /@ c2, Flatten@Position[Rows, #]& /@ r2}];

SparseArray[positions -> Flatten @ Mat2, Length /@ {Col, Rows}] // MatrixForm // TeXForm


$\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & f(\{-2,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,1\}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & f(\{1,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,1\}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & f(\{2,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,1\}) \\ \end{array} \right)$



If you like, you can use f directly without having to use Mat2:


SparseArray[positions -> (f[Flatten[{Col[[#[[1]]]], Rows[[#[[2]]]]}]] & /@ 
     positions), Length /@ {Col, Rows}] // MatrixForm // TeXForm



same result



Original answer:


SparseArray


You can define a function f0 that takes two matrices as input and returns a SparseArray with the desired entries:


ClearAll[f0]
f0[m1_, m2_] := Module[{pos = Position[m1, Alternatives @@ Flatten[m2]]},
   SparseArray[pos -> Extract[m1, pos], Dimensions[m1]]];


f0[Mat1, Mat2] // MatrixForm // TeXForm


$\left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & f(\{-2,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{-2,0,1,1\}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & f(\{1,0,-1,1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,-1\}) & f(\{1,0,1,1\}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & f(\{2,1,-1,1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,-1\}) & f(\{2,1,1,1\}) \\ \end{array} \right)$



ReplaceAll


Alternatively, define a function f1 that gives 0 for any input except one that matches elements of Mat2 and use it with ReplaceAll:


ClearAll[f1]
f1[x : Alternatives @@ Flatten[Mat2]] := x

f1[_] := 0;

Mat1 /. a_f :> f1[a] // MatrixForm // TeXForm


same result



You can also Map f1 on Mat1 at level 2:


Map[f1, Mat1, {2}] // MatrixForm // TeXForm



same result



or use it to construct the result directly without creating Mat:


Outer[f1@f[Flatten[{#1, #2}]] &, Col, Rows, 1] // MatrixForm // TeXForm


same result



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more