Skip to main content

arithmetic - Puzzle with Mathematica


puzzle


Hello everyone, This is a puzzle I got from someone via social media. Basically, we need to fill up the boxes with the numbers 1-9 (no repetitions) that fit the multiplication and addition operations.


I managed to solve this puzzle by using a brute force method in Excel+VBA. However, it would be very interesting if it can be solved in Mathematica with its specialty as computational software. Any idea will be appreciated.


Thanks.




Answer



A non brute-force approach is the following, similar to my answer for the Zebra Puzzle.


Both puzzles are examples of constrainst satisfaction problems, that can be solved with Reduce/Minimize/Maximize or, more efficiently, with LinearProgramming.


The good about this approach is that you can easily extend and apply to many similar problems.


The common part:



  • Assign an index $i$ to each box from top left, $i=1,2,\ldots,9$.

  • In each box you should put a digit $k$, $k=1,\ldots,9$.

  • Assign an index $l$ to the whole number/row, $l=1,\ldots,5$.

  • the variable x[i,k] is $1$ if there is the digit $k$ in the cell $i$ and $0$ otherwise.


  • d[i] is the digit in cell $i$.

  • n[l] is the whole number in the row $l$ (one or two cell).




The easier and slower approach is with Maximize. Build constraints and pass to Maximize with a constant objective function, so Maximize will try only to satisfy constraints. Constraints are:



  • n[1] * n[2] == n[3]

  • n[3] + n[4] == n[5]

  • each cell should be filled with exactly one digit

  • each digit should be placed in exactly one cell


  • 0 <= x[i,k] <= 1, x[i,k] \elem Integers


That's all.


d[i_] := Sum[x[i, k] k, {k, 9}]
n[l_] := FromDigits[d /@ {{1, 2}, {3}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {8, 9}}[[l]]]

solution = Last@Maximize[{0, {
n[1]*n[2] == n[3],
n[3] + n[4] == n[5],
Table[Sum[x[i, k], {k, 9}] == 1, {i, 9}],

Table[Sum[x[i, k], {i, 9}] == 1, {k, 9}],
Thread[0 <= Flatten@Array[x, {9, 9}] <= 1]}},
Flatten@Array[x, {9, 9}], Integers];

Array[n, 5] /. solution


{17, 4, 68, 25, 93}



Not fast (not linear).





A faster approach is to use LinearProgramming, but you need to:



  • change the first constraint so that it become linear

  • manually build matrix and vectors input for LinearProgramming (see docs)


The next piece of code do that. Please note that the single non-linear constraint n[1]*n[2] == n[3] has been replaced with 18 linear "conditional" constraints.


d[i_] := Sum[x[i, k] k, {k, 9}]
n[l_] := FromDigits[d /@ {{1, 2}, {3}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {8, 9}}[[l]]]


vars = Flatten@Array[x, {9, 9}];

constraints = Flatten@{
Table[{
k n[1] >= n[3] - 75 (1 - x[3, k]),
k n[1] <= n[3] + 859 (1 - x[3, k])
}, {k, 9}],
n[3] + n[4] == n[5],
Table[Sum[x[i, k], {k, 9}] == 1, {i, 9}],
Table[Sum[x[i, k], {i, 9}] == 1, {k, 9}]};


bm = CoefficientArrays[Equal @@@ constraints, vars];
solution = LinearProgramming[
Table[0, Length@vars],
bm[[2]],
Transpose@{-bm[[1]],
constraints[[All, 0]] /. {LessEqual -> -1, Equal -> 0,
GreaterEqual -> 1}},
Table[{0, 1}, Length@vars],
Integers

];

Array[n, 5] /. Thread[vars -> solution]


{17, 4, 68, 25, 93}



The execution is now about instantaneous.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....