Skip to main content

arithmetic - Puzzle with Mathematica


puzzle


Hello everyone, This is a puzzle I got from someone via social media. Basically, we need to fill up the boxes with the numbers 1-9 (no repetitions) that fit the multiplication and addition operations.


I managed to solve this puzzle by using a brute force method in Excel+VBA. However, it would be very interesting if it can be solved in Mathematica with its specialty as computational software. Any idea will be appreciated.


Thanks.




Answer



A non brute-force approach is the following, similar to my answer for the Zebra Puzzle.


Both puzzles are examples of constrainst satisfaction problems, that can be solved with Reduce/Minimize/Maximize or, more efficiently, with LinearProgramming.


The good about this approach is that you can easily extend and apply to many similar problems.


The common part:



  • Assign an index $i$ to each box from top left, $i=1,2,\ldots,9$.

  • In each box you should put a digit $k$, $k=1,\ldots,9$.

  • Assign an index $l$ to the whole number/row, $l=1,\ldots,5$.

  • the variable x[i,k] is $1$ if there is the digit $k$ in the cell $i$ and $0$ otherwise.


  • d[i] is the digit in cell $i$.

  • n[l] is the whole number in the row $l$ (one or two cell).




The easier and slower approach is with Maximize. Build constraints and pass to Maximize with a constant objective function, so Maximize will try only to satisfy constraints. Constraints are:



  • n[1] * n[2] == n[3]

  • n[3] + n[4] == n[5]

  • each cell should be filled with exactly one digit

  • each digit should be placed in exactly one cell


  • 0 <= x[i,k] <= 1, x[i,k] \elem Integers


That's all.


d[i_] := Sum[x[i, k] k, {k, 9}]
n[l_] := FromDigits[d /@ {{1, 2}, {3}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {8, 9}}[[l]]]

solution = Last@Maximize[{0, {
n[1]*n[2] == n[3],
n[3] + n[4] == n[5],
Table[Sum[x[i, k], {k, 9}] == 1, {i, 9}],

Table[Sum[x[i, k], {i, 9}] == 1, {k, 9}],
Thread[0 <= Flatten@Array[x, {9, 9}] <= 1]}},
Flatten@Array[x, {9, 9}], Integers];

Array[n, 5] /. solution


{17, 4, 68, 25, 93}



Not fast (not linear).





A faster approach is to use LinearProgramming, but you need to:



  • change the first constraint so that it become linear

  • manually build matrix and vectors input for LinearProgramming (see docs)


The next piece of code do that. Please note that the single non-linear constraint n[1]*n[2] == n[3] has been replaced with 18 linear "conditional" constraints.


d[i_] := Sum[x[i, k] k, {k, 9}]
n[l_] := FromDigits[d /@ {{1, 2}, {3}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {8, 9}}[[l]]]


vars = Flatten@Array[x, {9, 9}];

constraints = Flatten@{
Table[{
k n[1] >= n[3] - 75 (1 - x[3, k]),
k n[1] <= n[3] + 859 (1 - x[3, k])
}, {k, 9}],
n[3] + n[4] == n[5],
Table[Sum[x[i, k], {k, 9}] == 1, {i, 9}],
Table[Sum[x[i, k], {i, 9}] == 1, {k, 9}]};


bm = CoefficientArrays[Equal @@@ constraints, vars];
solution = LinearProgramming[
Table[0, Length@vars],
bm[[2]],
Transpose@{-bm[[1]],
constraints[[All, 0]] /. {LessEqual -> -1, Equal -> 0,
GreaterEqual -> 1}},
Table[{0, 1}, Length@vars],
Integers

];

Array[n, 5] /. Thread[vars -> solution]


{17, 4, 68, 25, 93}



The execution is now about instantaneous.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...