Skip to main content

scoping - function fails to use local variable when it is called inside a Module


I have these two functions fun and microstep.Fun makes use of a Module construct within which I define the Array I need to store the values of magnetization for different temperatures (each case stored in a different row). microstep is the function that store the data at the correct position at each step of the Monte Carlo algorithm. The monte Carlo procedure doesn't matter really much now, what bothers me is that when I define the magnetization array inside fun, the function doesn't work properly:


   fun [numbofsets_, nsteps_] := Module [{confinit, magnetization, index},

index =
MapIndexed[ { #2[[1]], # } &, numbofsets ]; (* {index,
temp} tuple*)
confinit = RandomChoice[{-1, 1}, {10, 10}]; (*
initial random matrix *)

magnetization =
ConstantArray[ 0, {Length@numbofsets, nsteps}];


Table[

NestList[
microstep[ ##[[1]], ##[[2]], ##[[3]], ##[[4]] ] & \
, { index[[i, 1]], index[[i, 2]] , confinit, 2 } ,
nsteps];


, {i, 1, Length@numbofsets}];

]

and


microstep[tindex_, temp_, matrix_, mcindex_] :=
Module[{ tempmatrix = matrix, dimx, dimy, x , y , it = 1/temp, down,
up, left, right, spinsum , randnum, bool = False , J = 1 },


(* generic Metropolis Alghoritm *)
dimx = Dimensions[matrix][[1]];
dimy = Dimensions[matrix][[2]];
x = RandomInteger[{1, dimx}];
y = RandomInteger[{1, dimy}];
randnum = RandomReal[];
spinsum =
Plus[Compile`GetElement[matrix, Mod[x + 1, dimx, 1], y],
Compile`GetElement[matrix, Mod[x - 1, dimx, 1], y],
Compile`GetElement[matrix, x, Mod[y - 1, dimy, 1]],

Compile`GetElement[matrix, x, Mod[y + 1, dimy, 1]]];

If[2*J *spinsum*tempmatrix[[x, y]] < 0 \[Or]
randnum < E^(- it*2*J*tempmatrix[[x, y]]*spinsum)
,
tempmatrix[[x, y]] = -Compile`GetElement[matrix, x, y]; bool = True
];
(* tricky part starts here *)

If[bool,

magnetization[[tindex, mcindex]] =
Abs[(magnetization[[tindex, mcindex - 1]] +
2 *tempmatrix[[x, y]])] ;
,
magnetization[[tindex, mcindex]] =
magnetization[[tindex, mcindex - 1]];

];
{tindex, temp, tempmatrix, mcindex + 1}


]

now if i run


fun [{2, 3, 4}, 10]

i get



"Part specification magnetization[[1,1]] is longer than depth of \ object"



Meanwhile If I declare the magnetization array outside the Module, the function works properly giving me the correctly stored values, but it forces me to use global variables :



magnetization = ConstantArray[0, {3, 11}];
fun [{2, 3, 4}, 10];
magnetization


{ {0, 2, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 6}, {0, 2, 2, 0, 2, 2, 4, 4, 2, 0, 2}, {0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 8, 6, 6, 4, 4} })



I think the problem rise up from the fact that module is a scoping construct but I thought that a function called inside it would see the local variable but it doesn't and I don't know how to solve the problem. In c-like languages pointers can be used, is there anything similar in mathematica? Also, as always, any suggestion is appreciated



Answer



Does this work out for you?



Here I added magnetization as additional argument and gave microstep the attibute HoldAll to allow for call by reference.


SetAttributes[microstep, HoldAll];
microstep[tindex_, temp_, matrix_, mcindex_, magnetization_] :=
Module[{tempmatrix = matrix, dimx, dimy, x, y, it = 1/temp, down, up,
left, right, spinsum, randnum, bool = False,
J = 1},(*generic Metropolis Alghoritm*)

dimx = Dimensions[matrix][[1]];
dimy = Dimensions[matrix][[2]];
x = RandomInteger[{1, dimx}];

y = RandomInteger[{1, dimy}];
randnum = RandomReal[];
spinsum = Plus[
Compile`GetElement[matrix, Mod[x + 1, dimx, 1], y],
Compile`GetElement[matrix, Mod[x - 1, dimx, 1], y],
Compile`GetElement[matrix, x, Mod[y - 1, dimy, 1]],
Compile`GetElement[matrix, x, Mod[y + 1, dimy, 1]]
];
If[2*J*spinsum*tempmatrix[[x, y]] < 0 ∨
randnum < E^(-it*2*J*tempmatrix[[x, y]]*spinsum),

tempmatrix[[x, y]] = -Compile`GetElement[matrix, x, y];
bool = True];
(*tricky part starts here*)
If[bool, magnetization[[tindex, mcindex]] = Abs[(magnetization[[tindex, mcindex - 1]] + 2*tempmatrix[[x, y]])];,
magnetization[[tindex, mcindex]] = magnetization[[tindex, mcindex - 1]];
];
{tindex, temp, tempmatrix, mcindex + 1}]

There was also a second issue within fun: Apparently, the array magnetization was set up a bit too short, so I prolonged it by 1. Removing also some ;, the function fun executes without error and returns a result. Checking wether the result is correct is up to you.


fun[numbofsets_, nsteps_] := 

Module[{confinit, index},
index = MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #} &, numbofsets];(*{index,temp} tuple*)

confinit = RandomChoice[{-1, 1}, {10, 10}];(*initial random matrix*)

magnetization = ConstantArray[0, {Length@numbofsets, nsteps + 1}];
Table[
NestList[
microstep[##[[1]], ##[[2]], ##[[3]], ##[[4]], magnetization] &,
{index[[i, 1]], index[[i, 2]], confinit, 2}, nsteps

]
,
{i, 1, Length@numbofsets}]
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....