Skip to main content

evaluation - How to properly DumpSave & Get Global`s symbols inside packages while not touching Global context?


For efficiency reasons I prefer to use DumpSave instead of Save.


For ease of access I prefer to save symbols in DumpSaved files inside Global` context.


But when my code evolved and I moved it inside packages I found a lot of problems to read symbols from those DumpSaved files so that read & write process




  • allows for use saved variables inside my package (and its context)

  • does not affect variables in Global`

  • When user loads the file directly with Get, bypassing my package (and perhaps not even loading it), the symbol is available in Global` context for him or her

  • symbol name is not hard-coded into function (but of course it must hard-coded into the file itself :-( )


Simply put: I want to use DumpSave & Get the way I use Export & Import, but with efficiency and flexibility benefits.


I come up with the following code, but it still messes the Global context and has the symbol name hardcoded (Global`myglobalname):


SaveMySymbol[object_,path_String]:= Block[{},
OwnValues[Global`myglobalname] = HoldPattern[Global`myglobalname] :> object;

DumpSave[
path<>".mx", Global`myglobalname]];

LoadMySymbol[path_String]:= Block[{strfullpath},
strfullpath = path<>".mx";
If[FileExistsQ[strfullpath], Get[strfullpath]; Global`myglobalname,
Null]]

I guess the problem with messing the Global` context can be avoided by caching the maybe existing definition of Global`myglobalname symbol and returning it back after Get. But the code look already awfully complex (it took me a full day to figure out the trick with OwnValues) and I suspect that there must be an easy way... Well, so far there always was one with Mathematica...



Answer




To show how this is possible:



Simply put: I want to use DumpSave & Get the way I use Export & Import, but with efficiency and flexibility benefits.



You can simply use Import and Export. They do support the same format that DumpSave uses, and they give you the same performance. But they don't save symbol names.


Export["data.mx", data, "MX"]

data = Import["data.mx"]

MX files are not portable between architectures though, so you may consider using Compressed strings, as described here. This is several times slower, but it's still quite fast compared to any other alternative and it's portable.



If you ever need to save InterpolatingFunctions, please be aware of this problem.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....