Skip to main content

differential equations - Piecewise causes ndnum warning in NDSolve


Bug introduced in 8.0.4 or earlier.





I try to solve the heat transfer equation with boundary condition that depends on time:


r0 = 0.75 10^-3;(*Beam spot size, m*)
ω = π ν;
ν = 1; (*pulse repetition rate, Hz*)

c = 1710;(*Heat capacity, W/(m·K)*)
ρ = 879; (*Density, kg/m^3*)
λ = 0.111;(*Heat conductivity, W/(m·K)*)
T0 = 300;(*initial temperature,K*)

T1 = 1000 - T0; (*Hot state temperature, K*)
Rm = 3 10^-3;(*Sample Radius, m*)
zm = 2 10^-3 ;(*Sample thickness, m*)

eq = D[T[R, z, t], t] == λ/(
c ρ) (1/(R + 10^-20) D[R D[T[R, z, t], R], R] +
D[T[R, z, t], {z, 2}]);

init1 = T[R, z, 0] == T0;
bc1 = D[T[R, z, t], {R, 1}] == 0 /. R -> 0;

bc2 = D[T[R, z, t], {R, 1}] == 0 /. R -> Rm;
bc3 = T[R, z, t] ==
Piecewise[{{T0 + T1 (1 - Abs@Sin[ω t])^500,
0 <= R <= r0}, {T0, True}}] /. z -> 0;
bc4 = T[R, z, t] == T0 /. z -> zm;

sol = NDSolveValue[{eq, init1, bc1, bc2, bc3, bc4},
T[R, z, t], {R, 0, Rm}, {z, 0, zm}, {t, 0, 10},
AccuracyGoal -> 30, MaxStepFraction -> 0.05]


The piecewise function defines the temperature at the left side of the z-interval as a short square pulses coming with frequency ω to central part of the disk.


However, solver returns the error-messages:



NDSolveValue::ibcinc: Warning: boundary and initial conditions are inconsistent. NDSolveValue::ndnum: Encountered non-numerical value for a derivative at t == 0.



What's wrong? I've tried with FEM package but it produce even more error-messages :)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

functions - What best practices or performance considerations are there for choosing between Cases, Position, Pick and Select?

Cases , Select , Pick and Position each have different syntaxes and purposes, but there are times when you can express the same calculation equivalently using either of them. So with this input: test = RandomInteger[{-25, 25}, {20, 2}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {-8, -19}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {-3, -25}, {21, -18}, {4, 4}, {2, -2}, {-24, 8}, {-17, -8}, {4, -18}, {22, -24}, {-4, -3}, {21, 0}, {19, 18}, {-23, -8}, {23, -25}, {14, -2}, {-1, -13}} You can get the following equivalent results: Cases[test, {_, _?Positive}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Select[test, #[[2]] > 0 &] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Pick[test, Sign[test[[All, 2]] ], 1] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} test[[Flatten@Position[test[[All, 2]], _?Positive] ]] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Are there performance or other considerations that should guide which you shou...