Skip to main content

solve non-linear system of equations


I have a system of equations and I want to solve it to get x, y


$$\begin{cases} u= C_{1}+(x-C_{1})(1+k_{1}((x-C_{1})(x-C_{1})+(y-C_{2})(y-C_{2}))) \\ \\ v= C_{2}+(y-C_{2})(1+k_{2}((x-C_{1})(x-C_{1})+(y-C_{2})(y-C_{2}))) \end{cases}$$



If it possible I want to know how can it can be done in C++ too.


Update: Solve[] gives me very large output, so the problem is that I want to place solution in my C++ aplication and $C_1$, $C_2$, $k_1$, $k_2$ are variables. CForm[] doesn't help, I need more simple and suitable form for C++ to use.



Answer



Without further assumptions of your used constants the solution is quite lengthy


eqs = {
  u == c1 + (x - c1) (1 + 
       k1 ((x - c1) (x - c1) + (y - c2) (y - c2))),
  v == c2 + (y - c2) (1 + k2 ((x - c1) (x - c1) + (y - c2) (y - c2)))
  };
Reduce[eqs, {x, y}]


If you can provide numerical values for your constants $C_n$ and $k_n$ it is probably possible to shorten the solution.


Please have a look on your system and notice, how the number of possible (real) solutions varies when the variables change


Manipulate[
 ContourPlot[{u == 
    c1 + (x - c1) (1 + k1 ((x - c1) (x - c1) + (y - c2) (y - c2))), 
   v == c2 + (y - c2) (1 + 
        k2 ((x - c1) (x - c1) + (y - c2) (y - c2)))}, {x, -5, 
   5}, {y, -5, 5}, PlotPoints -> ControlActive[10, 40], 
  MaxRecursion -> ControlActive[1, 5]],

 {u, -1, 1},
 {v, -1, 1},
 {c1, -1, 1},
 {c2, -1, 1},
 {k1, -1, 1},
 {k2, -1, 1}
]

enter image description here


Addionally, lets investigate in the first solution you get from the Reduce call



k1 == 0 && x == u && k2 != 0 && 
(y == Root[(-c1^2)*c2*k2 - c2^3*k2 + 2*c1*c2*k2*u - c2*k2*u^2 - v + 
   (1 + c1^2*k2 + 3*c2^2*k2 - 2*c1*k2*u + k2*u^2)*#1 - 3*c2*k2*#1^2 + k2*#1^3 & ,1] || 
 y == Root[(-c1^2)*c2*k2 - c2^3*k2 + 2*c1*c2*k2*u - c2*k2*u^2 - v + 
   (1 + c1^2*k2 + 3*c2^2*k2 - 2*c1*k2*u + k2*u^2)*#1 - 3*c2*k2*#1^2 + k2*#1^3 & ,2] || 
 y == Root[(-c1^2)*c2*k2 - c2^3*k2 + 2*c1*c2*k2*u - c2*k2*u^2 - v + 
   (1 + c1^2*k2 + 3*c2^2*k2 - 2*c1*k2*u + k2*u^2)*#1 - 3*c2*k2*#1^2 + k2*#1^3 & ,3])

What I want to show you is that you can hack the output of Reduce directly into C++. The only thing you need is a if/else way through all the possible forms your solution can have.


Looking at the output above, you see that when k1==0 and k2!=0 your solution is that x=u and y can take 3 values. These three values are the roots of a polynomial of third order. Therefore, your three points are {x,y1}, {x,y2}, {x,y3}. Using the Manipulate and set k1 to zero shows, that this is correct:



enter image description here


The points where the red and the blue lines cross have indeed the same x and 3 different y.


Therefore, the only thing required for your C++ code are basic arithmetic operations and a root-solver for polynomials of third order.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more