Skip to main content

performance tuning - MapThread and Compile


After discovering that MapIndexed cannot be used with compile (see MapIndexed and Compile) I am now trying do implement similar functionality using a combination of MapThread and Map. Unfortunately I am running into problems even when only using MapThread.


Here is a test-scenario:


Create Lists first:


A = {{1, 2}, {2, 3}};
B = {{{1, 2, 3}, {2, 3, 4}}, {{2, 3, 4}, {3, 4, 5}}};


The I simply run MapThread with function List[] to obtain a suitable combination of those lists and put the whole thing inside a Compile-statement:


test = Compile[{{B, _Real, 3}, {A, _Real, 2}}, MapThread[List[#1, #2, #3] &, {B, A, A}, 2]];

But when running test[B,A] I get the following compile error:



CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 15; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation.



When using CompilePrint[test] instruction 15 shows a call to MainEvaluate.


Unfortunately I currently have no clue how to fix that problem. Any hint is appreciated.




Answer



Incorporating the comments into an answer:



I don't think you are allowed to have lists of that irregular shape, i.e. {{1, 2, 3}, 1, 1}. Note that it works as expected with Plus[#1,#2,#3]&. See for instance Compile[{}, Block[{a = {1, 2}, b = 3}, {a, b}]][]ssch Oct 15 '13 at 14:20


indeed, Compile only works with rectangular arrays of consistent type -- because otherwise they cannot be packed. Arrays in Compile are packed arrays, and ragged arrays destroy packing, and hence, compilation. – Andreas Lauschke Oct 15 '13 at 14:39



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....