Skip to main content

graphics - How to draw Fractal images of iteration functions on the Riemann sphere?


Prof. McClure, in the work "M. McClure, Newton's method for complex polynomials. A preprint version of a “Mathematical graphics” column from Mathematica in Education and Research, pp. 1–15 (2006)", discusses how Mathematica can be applied to iteration functions for obtaining the basins of attraction (or their fractal images). Below, I provide his code for the fractal image of the polynomial $p(z)=z^3-1$:


p[z_] := z^3 - 1;
theRoots = z /. NSolve[p[z] == 0, z]
cp = Compile[{{z, _Complex}}, Evaluate[p[z]]];
n = Compile[{{z, _Complex}}, Evaluate[Simplify[z - p[z]/p'[z]]]];
bail = 150;
orbitData = Table[

NestWhileList[n, x + I y, Abs[cp[#]] > 0.01 &, 1, bail],
{y, -1, 1, 0.01}, {x, -1, 1, 0.01}
];
numRoots = Length[Union[theRoots]];
sameRootFunc = Compile[{{z, _Complex}}, Evaluate[Abs[3 p[z]/p'[z]]]];
whichRoot[orbit_] :=
Module[{i, z},
z = Last[orbit]; i = 1;
Scan[If[Abs[z - #] < sameRootFunc[z], Return[i], i++] &, theRoots];
If[i <= numRoots, {i, Length[orbit]}, None]

];
rootData = Map[whichRoot, orbitData, {2}];
colorList = {{cc, 0, 0}, {cc, cc, 0}, {0, 0, cc}};
cols = rootData /. {
{k_Integer, l_Integer} :> (colorList[[k]] /. cc -> (1 - l/(bail + 1))^8),
None -> {0, 0, 0}
};
Graphics[{Raster[cols]}]

Newton-Raphson fractal



My main question is here. He nicely obtained the fractal images on the complex plane, while it would be an interesting challenge to obtain these images on the Riemann sphere, e.g.


Newton-Raphson fractal on the Riemann sphere


It seems the complex plane in this case has been replaced by a sphere, but how? I will be thankful if someone could revise the code given above for obtaining such beautiful fractal images on the Riemann sphere. Any tips and tricks will be fully appreciated as well.



Answer



I've decided to write a simplification+extension of Mark's routine as a separate answer. In particular, I wanted a routine that yields Riemann sphere fractals not only for Newton-Raphson, but also its higher-order generalizations (e.g. Halley's method).


I decided to use Kalantari's "basic iteration" family for the purpose. An $n$-th order member of the family looks like this:


$$x_{k+1}=x_k-f(x_k)\frac{\mathcal D_{n-1}(x_k)}{\mathcal D_n(x_k)}$$


where


$$\mathcal D_0(x_k)=1,\qquad\mathcal D_n(x_k)=\begin{vmatrix}f^\prime(x_k)&\tfrac{f^{\prime\prime}(x_k)}{2!}&\cdots&\tfrac{f^{(n-2)}(x_k)}{(n-2)!}&\tfrac{f^{(n-1)}(x_k)}{(n-1)!}\\f(x_k)&f^\prime(x_k)&\ddots&\vdots&\tfrac{f^{(n-2)}(x_k)}{(n-2)!}\\&f(x_k)&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\\&&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\\&&&f(x_k)&f^\prime(x_k)\end{vmatrix}$$


As noted in that paper, the basic family generalizes the Newton-Raphson iteration; $n=1$ corresponds to Newton-Raphson, while $n=2$ gives Halley's method. (Relatedly, see also Kalantari's work on polynomiography.)



Here's a routine for $\mathcal D_n(x)$:


iterdet[f_, x_, 0] := 1;
iterdet[f_, x_, n_Integer?Positive] := Det[ToeplitzMatrix[PadRight[{D[f, x], f}, n],
Table[SeriesCoefficient[Function[x, f]@\[FormalX], {\[FormalX], x, k}], {k, n}]]]

Here is the routine for generating the Riemann sphere fractals:


Options[rootFractalSphere] = {ColorFunction -> Automatic, ImageResolution -> 400,
MaxIterations -> 50, Order -> 1, Tolerance -> 0.01};

rootFractalSphere[fIn_, var_, opts : OptionsPattern[]] /; PolynomialQ[fIn, var] :=

Module[{γ = 0.2, bail, cf, colList, f, h, itFun, ord, roots, tex, tol},

f = Function[var, fIn];
ord = OptionValue[Order];
itFun = Function[var, var - Simplify[f[var] iterdet[f[var], var, ord - 1]/
iterdet[f[var], var, ord]] // Evaluate];

roots = var /. NSolve[f[var], var];
cf = OptionValue[ColorFunction];
If[cf === Automatic, cf = ColorData[61]];

colList = Append[Table[List @@ ColorConvert[cf[k], RGBColor], {k, Length[roots]}],
{0., 0., 0.}];

bail = OptionValue[MaxIterations]; tol = OptionValue[Tolerance];
makeColor = Compile[{{z0, _Complex}},
Module[{cnt = 0, i = 1, z},
z = FixedPoint[(++cnt; itFun[#]) &, z0, bail,
SameTest -> (Abs[f[#2]] < tol &)];
Scan[If[Abs[z - #] < 10 tol, Return[i], i++] &, roots];
Abs[colList[[i]] (cnt/bail)^γ]],

CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True},
RuntimeAttributes -> {Listable}, RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"];

h = π/OptionValue[ImageResolution];
tex = Developer`ToPackedArray[makeColor[
Table[Cot[φ/2] Exp[I θ], {φ, h, π - h, h}, {θ, -π, π, h}]]];

ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[θ] Sin[φ], Sin[θ] Sin[φ], Cos[φ]}, {θ, -π, π}, {φ, 0, π},
Axes -> False, Boxed -> False, Lighting -> "Neutral", Mesh -> None,
PlotPoints -> 75, PlotStyle -> Texture[tex],

Evaluate[Sequence @@ FilterRules[{opts}, Options[Graphics3D]]]]]

Other notes:




  • The compiled functions limitInfo[] and color[] have been merged into the single function makeColor[]. This function was not localized on purpose to allow its use even after executing rootFractalSphere[].




  • Texture[] can directly accept an array of RGB triplets, so there is no need to use Image[] if these triplets are being generated directly by makeColor[].





Now, for some examples. The first two are Newton-Raphson fractals:


rootFractalSphere[z^3 - 1, z]

Newton-Raphson fractal of z^3 - 1


rootFractalSphere[(2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10, z]

Newton-Raphson fractal of (2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10


Here is a fractal generated by Halley's method:


rootFractalSphere[(2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10, z, Order -> 2]


Halley fractal of (2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10


Finally, a fractal from a third order iteration:


rootFractalSphere[z^10 - z^5 - 1, z, ColorFunction -> ColorData[54], 
MaxIterations -> 200, Order -> 3]

Third-order iteration fractal for z^10 - z^5 - 1


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.