Skip to main content

graphics - How to draw Fractal images of iteration functions on the Riemann sphere?


Prof. McClure, in the work "M. McClure, Newton's method for complex polynomials. A preprint version of a “Mathematical graphics” column from Mathematica in Education and Research, pp. 1–15 (2006)", discusses how Mathematica can be applied to iteration functions for obtaining the basins of attraction (or their fractal images). Below, I provide his code for the fractal image of the polynomial $p(z)=z^3-1$:


p[z_] := z^3 - 1;
theRoots = z /. NSolve[p[z] == 0, z]
cp = Compile[{{z, _Complex}}, Evaluate[p[z]]];
n = Compile[{{z, _Complex}}, Evaluate[Simplify[z - p[z]/p'[z]]]];
bail = 150;
orbitData = Table[

NestWhileList[n, x + I y, Abs[cp[#]] > 0.01 &, 1, bail],
{y, -1, 1, 0.01}, {x, -1, 1, 0.01}
];
numRoots = Length[Union[theRoots]];
sameRootFunc = Compile[{{z, _Complex}}, Evaluate[Abs[3 p[z]/p'[z]]]];
whichRoot[orbit_] :=
Module[{i, z},
z = Last[orbit]; i = 1;
Scan[If[Abs[z - #] < sameRootFunc[z], Return[i], i++] &, theRoots];
If[i <= numRoots, {i, Length[orbit]}, None]

];
rootData = Map[whichRoot, orbitData, {2}];
colorList = {{cc, 0, 0}, {cc, cc, 0}, {0, 0, cc}};
cols = rootData /. {
{k_Integer, l_Integer} :> (colorList[[k]] /. cc -> (1 - l/(bail + 1))^8),
None -> {0, 0, 0}
};
Graphics[{Raster[cols]}]

Newton-Raphson fractal



My main question is here. He nicely obtained the fractal images on the complex plane, while it would be an interesting challenge to obtain these images on the Riemann sphere, e.g.


Newton-Raphson fractal on the Riemann sphere


It seems the complex plane in this case has been replaced by a sphere, but how? I will be thankful if someone could revise the code given above for obtaining such beautiful fractal images on the Riemann sphere. Any tips and tricks will be fully appreciated as well.



Answer



I've decided to write a simplification+extension of Mark's routine as a separate answer. In particular, I wanted a routine that yields Riemann sphere fractals not only for Newton-Raphson, but also its higher-order generalizations (e.g. Halley's method).


I decided to use Kalantari's "basic iteration" family for the purpose. An $n$-th order member of the family looks like this:


$$x_{k+1}=x_k-f(x_k)\frac{\mathcal D_{n-1}(x_k)}{\mathcal D_n(x_k)}$$


where


$$\mathcal D_0(x_k)=1,\qquad\mathcal D_n(x_k)=\begin{vmatrix}f^\prime(x_k)&\tfrac{f^{\prime\prime}(x_k)}{2!}&\cdots&\tfrac{f^{(n-2)}(x_k)}{(n-2)!}&\tfrac{f^{(n-1)}(x_k)}{(n-1)!}\\f(x_k)&f^\prime(x_k)&\ddots&\vdots&\tfrac{f^{(n-2)}(x_k)}{(n-2)!}\\&f(x_k)&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\\&&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\\&&&f(x_k)&f^\prime(x_k)\end{vmatrix}$$


As noted in that paper, the basic family generalizes the Newton-Raphson iteration; $n=1$ corresponds to Newton-Raphson, while $n=2$ gives Halley's method. (Relatedly, see also Kalantari's work on polynomiography.)



Here's a routine for $\mathcal D_n(x)$:


iterdet[f_, x_, 0] := 1;
iterdet[f_, x_, n_Integer?Positive] := Det[ToeplitzMatrix[PadRight[{D[f, x], f}, n],
Table[SeriesCoefficient[Function[x, f]@\[FormalX], {\[FormalX], x, k}], {k, n}]]]

Here is the routine for generating the Riemann sphere fractals:


Options[rootFractalSphere] = {ColorFunction -> Automatic, ImageResolution -> 400,
MaxIterations -> 50, Order -> 1, Tolerance -> 0.01};

rootFractalSphere[fIn_, var_, opts : OptionsPattern[]] /; PolynomialQ[fIn, var] :=

Module[{γ = 0.2, bail, cf, colList, f, h, itFun, ord, roots, tex, tol},

f = Function[var, fIn];
ord = OptionValue[Order];
itFun = Function[var, var - Simplify[f[var] iterdet[f[var], var, ord - 1]/
iterdet[f[var], var, ord]] // Evaluate];

roots = var /. NSolve[f[var], var];
cf = OptionValue[ColorFunction];
If[cf === Automatic, cf = ColorData[61]];

colList = Append[Table[List @@ ColorConvert[cf[k], RGBColor], {k, Length[roots]}],
{0., 0., 0.}];

bail = OptionValue[MaxIterations]; tol = OptionValue[Tolerance];
makeColor = Compile[{{z0, _Complex}},
Module[{cnt = 0, i = 1, z},
z = FixedPoint[(++cnt; itFun[#]) &, z0, bail,
SameTest -> (Abs[f[#2]] < tol &)];
Scan[If[Abs[z - #] < 10 tol, Return[i], i++] &, roots];
Abs[colList[[i]] (cnt/bail)^γ]],

CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True},
RuntimeAttributes -> {Listable}, RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"];

h = π/OptionValue[ImageResolution];
tex = Developer`ToPackedArray[makeColor[
Table[Cot[φ/2] Exp[I θ], {φ, h, π - h, h}, {θ, -π, π, h}]]];

ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[θ] Sin[φ], Sin[θ] Sin[φ], Cos[φ]}, {θ, -π, π}, {φ, 0, π},
Axes -> False, Boxed -> False, Lighting -> "Neutral", Mesh -> None,
PlotPoints -> 75, PlotStyle -> Texture[tex],

Evaluate[Sequence @@ FilterRules[{opts}, Options[Graphics3D]]]]]

Other notes:




  • The compiled functions limitInfo[] and color[] have been merged into the single function makeColor[]. This function was not localized on purpose to allow its use even after executing rootFractalSphere[].




  • Texture[] can directly accept an array of RGB triplets, so there is no need to use Image[] if these triplets are being generated directly by makeColor[].





Now, for some examples. The first two are Newton-Raphson fractals:


rootFractalSphere[z^3 - 1, z]

Newton-Raphson fractal of z^3 - 1


rootFractalSphere[(2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10, z]

Newton-Raphson fractal of (2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10


Here is a fractal generated by Halley's method:


rootFractalSphere[(2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10, z, Order -> 2]


Halley fractal of (2 z/3)^8 - (2 z/3)^2 + 1/10


Finally, a fractal from a third order iteration:


rootFractalSphere[z^10 - z^5 - 1, z, ColorFunction -> ColorData[54], 
MaxIterations -> 200, Order -> 3]

Third-order iteration fractal for z^10 - z^5 - 1


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?