Skip to main content

DSolve for Second Order Differential


I have an equation


y''[t] + w^2*Sin[y[t]] == 0

So I'm using DSolve like this:


DSolve[{y''[t] + w^2*Sin[y[t]] == 0, y[0] == yrad, y'[0] == 0}, y[t], t]


Where yrad=Pi/9 I keep getting the ifun,inexand bvfail errors. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?


Thanks so much


EDIT: Sorry I just realized I left out w=1.4



Answer



Note: This is for V9. DSolve works in V10


Consider the general solution:


sols = DSolve[{y''[t] + w^2*Sin[y[t]] == 0}, y, t]


Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are being used by Solve, so some solutions may not be found; use Reduce for complete solution information. >>




(*
{{y -> Function[{t},
-2 JacobiAmplitude[1/2 Sqrt[(2 w^2 + C[1]) (t + C[2])^2], (4 w^2)/(2 w^2 + C[1])]]},
{y -> Function[{t},
2 JacobiAmplitude[1/2 Sqrt[(2 w^2 + C[1]) (t + C[2])^2], (4 w^2)/(2 w^2 + C[1])]]}}
*)

It's not particularly easy to solve for the coefficients C[1] and C[2] for a given IVP. Perhaps you can figure out how to use it, though?


Given concrete numbers for the parameters, values can be found:



cons1 = Block[{w = 1.4},
FindRoot[{y[0] == Pi/9, y'[0] == 0} /. First[sols] /.
Thread[{C[1], C[2]} -> {c1, c2}], {c1, 1}, {c2, 1}]
]


FindRoot::cvmit: Failed to converge to the requested accuracy or precision within 100 iterations. >>



(*
{c1 -> -3.93237 + 3.84299*10^-6 I, c2 -> 0.00280231 + 0.0000103908 I}

*)

Second solution:


cons2 = Block[{w = 1.4},
FindRoot[{y[0] == Pi/9, y'[0] == 0} /. Last[sols] /.
Thread[{C[1], C[2]} -> {c1, c2}], {c1, 1}, {c2, 1}]
]
(*
{c1 -> -3.6836 - 2.3703*10^-16 I, c2 -> 1.1306 + 5.30368*10^-16 I}
*)


We should check the solutions. This is not particularly easy since JacobiAmplitude won't be easy to simplify symbolically. So let's check it numerically. First the particular solutions produced by the above results of FindRoot:


sols0 = MapThread[ReplaceAll, {sols, {cons1, cons2}}];

Next, we'll check the residuals of the differential equation and the initial conditions:


Block[{w = 1.4, yrad = Pi/9},
{y''[t] + w^2*Sin[y[t]] == 0, y[0] == yrad, y'[0] == 0} /.
Equal -> Subtract /. sols0 // FullSimplify
] /. t -> RandomReal[1, 10] // Chop
(*

{{{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, -0.349067 + 0.000311727 I, 0.0000172797 + 0.111239 I},
{{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 0, 0}}
*)

Clearly the first solution does not satisfy the initial conditions. Therefore only the second solution is valid.


Last[sols0]
(*
{y -> Function[{t},
2 JacobiAmplitude[1/2 Sqrt[(2 w^2 - (3.6836 + 2.02417*10^-17 I)) (t + (1.1306 +
1.24204*10^-16 I))^2], (4 w^2)/(2 w^2 - (3.6836 + 2.02417*10^-17 I))]]}

*)



Note: The hint in one of the error messages suggests trying Reduce. That may be tried using the following:


Block[{opts, res},
opts = Options[Solve];
SetOptions[Solve, Method -> Reduce];
res = DSolve[{y''[t] + w^2*Sin[y[t]] == 0, y[0] == yrad, y'[0] == 0},
y[t], t];
SetOptions[Solve, opts];

res
]


DSolve::bvimp: General solution contains implicit solutions. In the boundary value problem, these solutions will be ignored, so some of the solutions will be lost. >>



(*
{}
*)


Obviously, it is not successful in this case. By the way, the message here suggested the above method to me. (So the messages, imo, often contain useful hints.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....