Skip to main content

associations - Create Nested List from tabular data


Im trying to create a nested list from tabular data, then onward into a nested association. I can get part way with the help of this answer but it only works for the first level. Repeated use of this approach doesn't seem to work.


list=  {{"Category", "Detail", "Value"}, {"Cat1", "detail1", 23},

{"Cat1", "detail2", 27}, {"Cat1", "detail3", 13}, {"Cat2", "detail4",15}, 
{"Cat2", "detail5", 35}, {"Cat3", "Detail6", 56}};

list // TableForm

(*  tabular data result *)

First level of data.


Thread[list[[2 ;;, 2]] -> #] & /@ {list[[2 ;;, 3]]} // ToAssociations


 {<|detail1->23,detail2->27,detail3->13,detail4->15,detail5->35,Detail6->56|>}

Required result


{<| Cat1-> <|detail1->23,detail2->27,detail3->13|>|>,
<| Cat2-> <|detail4->15,detail5->35|>|>,
<| Cat3-> <|Detail6->56|>|>}

Update is it possible to come up with something that works for N levels of nesting?


Eg 3 levels of nesting


list = {{"BigCat", "Category", "Detail", "Value"}, {"BigCat", "Cat1", 

   "detail1", 23}, {"BigCat", "Cat1", "detail2", 27}, {"BigCat", 
   "Cat1", "detail3", 13}, {"BigCat", "Cat2", "detail4", 
   15}, {"BigCat", "Cat2", "detail5", 35}, {"LittleCat", "Cat3", 
   "Detail6", 56}}

Answer



From my answer to Handy / flexible directory tree operations with minor modification:


fn[x_List] := GroupBy[x, First -> Rest, fn]

fn[{{x_}}] := x


Tested on your two lists, named list1 and list2 respectively:


fn[Rest @ list1]


<|"Cat1" -> <|"detail1" -> 23, "detail2" -> 27, "detail3" -> 13|>, 
 "Cat2" -> <|"detail4" -> 15, "detail5" -> 35|>, "Cat3" -> <|"Detail6" -> 56|>|>

fn[Rest @ list2]



<|"BigCat" -> <|"Cat1" -> <|"detail1" -> 23, "detail2" -> 27, "detail3" -> 13|>, 
   "Cat2" -> <|"detail4" -> 15, "detail5" -> 35|>|>, 
 "LittleCat" -> <|"Cat3" -> <|"Detail6" -> 56|>|>|>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more