Skip to main content

Check if symbol is in core language


How can I check if a symbol is pre-defined by Mathematica, in a way that's backwards compatible with old versions?


i.e. I would like some CoreLanguageQ[x_Symbol] which matches CoreLangaugeQ[Print], but not CoreLanguageQ[f]



Then it can be used to help make code backwards compatible, eg.


If[!CoreLanguageQ[Echo], Echo[x_]:= (Print[x];x)]

Thank you.



Answer



You can look it up using WolframLanguageData, which has a list of all pre-defined symbols:


ClearAll[CoreLanguageQ]
SetAttributes[CoreLanguageQ, HoldAll]
CoreLanguageQ[x_] := With[{name = SymbolName[x]}, CoreLanguageQ[name]]
CoreLanguageQ[x_String] := With[{

   names = WolframLanguageData[All, "Name"]
   }, MemberQ[names, x]]

CoreLanguageQ[Plot]
(* Out: True *)

CoreLanguageQ[Plott]
(* Out: False *)

Looking at the context of the symbol is also a viable approach. However, the WolframLanguageData approach is appealing because the documentation states that




WolframLanguageData[] gives a list of all Wolfram Language symbols.



Which is to say, the list returned by this function is by definition Wolfram Language. This is as close as a definition of "core language" that we can come.


For the problem in the updated question, it would seem appropriate to check if a symbol exists in the System context like QuantumDot suggests in a comment.


The only backward compatible way to use this would be to create lists of functions available for specific versions and include them in your code. For example:


names = WolframLanguageData[All, "Name"];
versionIntroduced = WolframLanguageData[All, "VersionIntroduced"];
allowed = Pick[names, Thread[versionIntroduced <= 10]];


In this code, allowed holds all the symbols that exist in version 10, presuming that no symbol previously introduced was removed.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more