Skip to main content

Check if symbol is in core language


How can I check if a symbol is pre-defined by Mathematica, in a way that's backwards compatible with old versions?


i.e. I would like some CoreLanguageQ[x_Symbol] which matches CoreLangaugeQ[Print], but not CoreLanguageQ[f]



Then it can be used to help make code backwards compatible, eg.


If[!CoreLanguageQ[Echo], Echo[x_]:= (Print[x];x)]

Thank you.



Answer



You can look it up using WolframLanguageData, which has a list of all pre-defined symbols:


ClearAll[CoreLanguageQ]
SetAttributes[CoreLanguageQ, HoldAll]
CoreLanguageQ[x_] := With[{name = SymbolName[x]}, CoreLanguageQ[name]]
CoreLanguageQ[x_String] := With[{

names = WolframLanguageData[All, "Name"]
}, MemberQ[names, x]]

CoreLanguageQ[Plot]
(* Out: True *)

CoreLanguageQ[Plott]
(* Out: False *)

Looking at the context of the symbol is also a viable approach. However, the WolframLanguageData approach is appealing because the documentation states that




WolframLanguageData[] gives a list of all Wolfram Language symbols.



Which is to say, the list returned by this function is by definition Wolfram Language. This is as close as a definition of "core language" that we can come.


For the problem in the updated question, it would seem appropriate to check if a symbol exists in the System context like QuantumDot suggests in a comment.


The only backward compatible way to use this would be to create lists of functions available for specific versions and include them in your code. For example:


names = WolframLanguageData[All, "Name"];
versionIntroduced = WolframLanguageData[All, "VersionIntroduced"];
allowed = Pick[names, Thread[versionIntroduced <= 10]];


In this code, allowed holds all the symbols that exist in version 10, presuming that no symbol previously introduced was removed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...