Skip to main content

plotting - How to simulate Placed in workaround for PlotLegends ParametricPlot bug?


I'd like Legended output for call like:


rcap = {Cos[#], Sin[#]} & ;
p1 = ParametricPlot[{Sin[t] rcap[t], Sin[t]^2 rcap[t]}, {t, 0, Pi},
  PlotRange -> {-1, 1}, AxesLabel -> {x, y}

  , PlotLegends ->
   Placed[{"sin(\[Theta])",
     "\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(sin\), \(2\)]\)(\[Theta])"}, {Right,
     Bottom}]
  ]

But have hit the ParametricPlot has PlotLegends bug detailed in ParametricPlot and PlotLegends don't seem to cooperate .


I applied the list of functions answer to my plot (adding expressions for my labels) like so:


x1 = With[{funcList = {Sin[t] rcap[t], Sin[t]^2 rcap[t]},
   labelList = {"sin(\[Theta])",

     "\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(sin\), \(2\)]\)(\[Theta])"}
   }, With[{n = Length@funcList},
   Legended[
    ParametricPlot[funcList, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotRange -> {-1, 1},
     AxesLabel -> {x, y}],
    LineLegend[(ColorData[1][#]) & /@ #, labelList[[#]]] &@Range@n]]
  ]

which does successfully include a legend:


capture of image



however, the placement of the legend text is outside of the image. Is there a way to add Placed like options to the Legended function?



Answer



From Legended >> Details:



enter image description here



x1 = With[{funcList = {Sin[t] rcap[t], Sin[t]^2 rcap[t]}, 
           labelList = {"sin(\[Theta])", "\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(sin\), \(2\)]\)(\[Theta])"}}, 
  With[{n = Length@funcList}, 
   Legended[ParametricPlot[funcList, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotRange -> {-1, 1}, AxesLabel -> {x, y}], 

       Placed[LineLegend[(ColorData[1][#]) & /@ #, labelList[[#]]] &@Range@n, {Right, Bottom}]]]]

enter image description here


You can also use PlotLegends instead of Legended as follows:


x1 = With[{funcList = {Sin[t] rcap[t], Sin[t]^2 rcap[t]}, 
   labelList = {"sin(\[Theta])", "\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(sin\), \(2\)]\)(\[Theta])"}}, 
  With[{n = Length@funcList}, 
   ParametricPlot[funcList, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotRange -> {-1, 1}, AxesLabel -> {x, y},
    PlotLegends -> Placed[LineLegend[ColorData[1][#] & /@ Range@n, labelList[[Range@n]]], 
                  {Right, Bottom}]]]]

 (* same picture *)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more