Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to convert a RawArray of bytes to ByteArray?


A ByteArray can be converted to a RawArray:



ba = ByteArray[{1, 2, 3, 4}]
(* ByteArray[{1, 2, 3, 4}] *)

ra = RawArray["Byte", ba]
(* RawArray["UnsignedInteger8",{1, 2, 3, 4}] *)

Normal[ra]
(* {1, 2, 3, 4} *)

Presumably, this is done without unpacking the ByteArray contents to 64-bit integers first (although I have no proof of this).



Is there a similar space-efficient way to convert a rank-1 byte-type RawArray to a ByteArray?



Answer



At present there is no way to do this from top level, since there is no interface to the internal function that converts a rank-1 RawArray of bytes into a ByteArray.


However, as already pointed out, it's possible to take advantage of LibraryLink which will do a conversion given an MRawArray on the C side and a "ByteArray" return type, for example


Needs["CCompilerDriver`"]

src = "
#include \"WolframLibrary.h\"
#include \"WolframRawArrayLibrary.h\"


DLLEXPORT mint WolframLibrary_getVersion() {
return WolframLibraryVersion;
}

DLLEXPORT int WolframLibrary_initialize( WolframLibraryData libData) {
return 0;
}

DLLEXPORT void WolframLibrary_uninitialize( WolframLibraryData libData) {
return;

}

DLLEXPORT int mrawarray_to_bytearray( WolframLibraryData libData,
mint Argc, MArgument *Args, MArgument Res) {

WolframRawArrayLibrary_Functions rawFuns = libData->rawarrayLibraryFunctions;
MRawArray ra;
mint rank;
rawarray_t type;


if (Argc != 1) return LIBRARY_FUNCTION_ERROR;
ra = MArgument_getMRawArray(Args[0]);

type = rawFuns->MRawArray_getType(ra);
rank = rawFuns->MRawArray_getRank(ra);

if (rank == 1 && type == MRawArray_Type_Ubit8) {
MArgument_setMRawArray(Res, ra);
return LIBRARY_NO_ERROR;
}

return LIBRARY_FUNCTION_ERROR;

}";

lib = CreateLibrary[src, "toByteArray"];

toByteArray = LibraryFunctionLoad[lib,
"mrawarray_to_bytearray", {"RawArray"}, "ByteArray"];

toByteArray[RawArray["Byte", {1, 2, 3, 4}]]


(* ByteArray["AQIDBA=="] *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.