Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to randomly select subsets


I have a list of around 300 elements. I want to sample subsets of length 25 such that my samples are all distinct. My first inclination was to use something like RandomSample[Subsets[list, {25}], 1000], but the problem is the number of subsets of length 25 out of a 300 element set is way to big for the computer to deal with. Anyone have a nice way to do this?



Answer



This question may be a duplicate but for the time being:



list = Range[300];

The number of subsets length 25:


n = Binomial[300, 25]


1953265141442868389822364184842211512

Five samples:


samp = RandomInteger[{1, n}, 5]



{1097179597483122074395819626389736050,
 1278400886908268917844987164926797363,
 1855898035549513136165016617586671669,
 1005956584417012779260052361741534263,
 1845054078551378518016127833496347335}

Your subsets:


 Subsets[list, {25}, {#}][[1]] & /@ samp



{{10,15,57,64,65,73,82,115,120,130,133,160,161,164,178,192,196,218,223,235,238,240,267,271,290},
{12,54,58,81,90,91,115,130,146,181,189,204,205,218,222,230,233,234,235,254,256,268,281,283,284},
{33,42,45,65,78,81,85,118,151,167,172,174,202,203,207,208,211,212,223,239,246,251,254,262,267},
{9,12,35,69,72,77,79,109,113,116,141,144,158,163,195,202,221,228,230,231,254,259,267,280,292},
{32,39,49,53,62,102,104,132,135,159,164,167,169,172,191,211,244,245,253,263,265,271,282,283,286}}

Be aware that RandomInteger could produce duplicate samples however for the example given it is extremely unlikely. You can produce more an use DeleteDuplicates and Take as needed.




I think kguler's answer is the better method, and I wish I had had the insight to realize it myself, however there is still some value in the method above. Referring to subsets by a single number can make them easier to handle.



  • They take less space.

  • Comparison (e.g. for removing duplicates) requires a single numeric comparison rather than a list comparison.

  • A given subset is independent of the input list; only length of input and subset matter.


One can "unrank" them at any time using the third parameter of Subsets as shown above.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more