Skip to main content

error - How to get rid of warnings when using Solve on an equation with inexact coefficients?


When I solve this equation in Mathematica 8, I can get the right answer, but with some uncomfortable warnings.



Equation:


Solve[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + k*l* 59.7, {k, l}]

Warnings:



Solve::ratnz: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients. The answer was obtained by solving a corresponding exact system and numericizing the result. >>



If I transform the above equation to the following, then it works fine, but this is not convenient:


{k, kl/k} /. Solve[-26.81 == 194 k + kl*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + kl* 59.7, {k, kl}]


So my question is, how can I get rid of such warnings?



Answer



You can get rid of the warning by converting everything to exact numbers yourself before passing the equation to Solve (the warning message suggests that this is what Solve does itself):


In[2]:= Rationalize[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 &&  22.2 == -74 k + k*l*59.7]
Out[2]= -(2681/100) == 194 k + (329 k l)/10 && 111/5 == -74 k + (597 k l)/10

In[3]:= Solve[%]
Out[3]= {{l -> -(2322860/2330937), k -> -(2330937/14016400)}}

In[4]:= N[%]

Out[4]= {{l -> -0.996535, k -> -0.166301}}

Solve (like all symbolic manipulation function) is meant to be used with exact numbers where roundoff errors are not an issue. For solving the equation numerically, use NSolve:


In[5]:= NSolve[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + k*l*59.7]
Out[5]= {{l -> -0.996535, k -> -0.166301}}



Some background on exact and inexact numbers:





  • Exact and Approximate Results




  • In Mathematica, any number with a decimal point in it is considered to be inexact, i.e. known only to a certain number of digits. 2 is exact, 2.0 is inexact machine precision and 2.0`5 is inexact arbitrary precision known to 5 digits.




  • Symbolic computations (Integrate, Solve, Reduce, etc.) work best with exact numbers. Try to avoid inexact numbers with such functions.




  • See more on Numbers





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.