Skip to main content

table - issue with Animate


I want to make a animation based on the dataset like


data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 - y^2}, {x, -3, 3}, {y, -3, 3}], 1];

I show this data using a ListPlot3D.



p2[θ_] := RotationTransform[θ, {0, 0, 1}]

When I use Table to generate the different images, it works fine.


test11 = Table[
  ListPlot3D[p2[a][data] /. {x_, y_, z_} -> {x, y, z*a}, Mesh -> 5, 
   MeshStyle -> White, Axes -> {False, False, True}, 
   PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, {-4, 4}, {-10, 10}}], {a, -1, 1, 0.1}]

Export["anigraf2.GIF", test11, "DisplayDurations" -> 1]


When I use 'Animate' to create the same output, Mathematica stops responding en I have to restart the software.


Animate[ListPlot3D[p2[a][data] /. {x_, y_, z_} -> {x, y, z*a}, 
  Mesh -> 5, MeshStyle -> White, Axes -> False, 
  PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, {-4, 4}, {-10, 10}}], {a, -1, 1, 0.1}, 
 AnimationDirection -> ForwardBackward, AnimationRunning -> True, 
 SaveDefinitions -> True]

Is there somebody who has suggestion for this issue?



Answer



For anything but the simplest of graphics objects, always avoid Animate and use ListAnimate instead.



The difference is that ListAnimate works on a pre-defined list of images to create an animation. All the rendering is done beforehand. With Animate, it attempts to do the rendering on the fly, when you are moving the slider.


So this will make the animation you are looking for,


data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 - y^2}, {x, -3, 3}, {y, -3, 3}], 1];
p2[θ_] := RotationTransform[θ, {0, 0, 1}];
imglist = Table[
   ListPlot3D[p2[a][data] /. {x_, y_, z_} -> {x, y, z*a}, Mesh -> 5, 
    MeshStyle -> White, Axes -> {False, False, True}, 
    PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, {-4, 4}, {-10, 10}}]
   , {a, -1, 1, 0.1}];
ListAnimate[

 imglist,
 AnimationDirection -> ForwardBackward, AnimationRunning -> True, 
 SaveDefinitions -> True]

Another option is to use Manipulate instead of Animate. Manipulate will render the 3D graphics using fewer points when you are moving the slider, giving you the changes quickly when it can at the expense of quality, and then generating the higher quality images when the slider stops moving. (Correct me if I am wrong here) I do not think that Animate does this.


So this runs relatively quickly on my machine,


Manipulate[
 ListPlot3D[p2[a][data] /. {x_, y_, z_} -> {x, y, z*a}, Mesh -> 5, 
  MeshStyle -> White, Axes -> {False, False, True}, 
  PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, {-4, 4}, {-10, 10}}]

 , {a, -1, 1, 0.05}]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more