Skip to main content

How to increase performance of this code for plotting a contour plot?


I have an equation which I need to triple integrate over a unit cube. The equation is


pot = NIntegrate[1/Sqrt[(x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 + (z - l)^2], {h,-1,1}, {k,-1, 
1},{l,-1,1}];

As soon as I enter Shift+Enter it immediately processes the command. But now what I want is to plot its ContourPlot for different z values (I chose z=0.5). So I give the command


ContourPlot[pot /. {z -> 0.5}, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}]


But this piece of code takes just forever to process. I just keep on waiting and waiting but processing never ends (it takes really really long time). I am not sure that how is this such a computationally heavy task. For z other than 0 it takes longer time.


Is there something that I am doing wrong? I don't think this is a drawback of the device I am using. Is there a way to improve the performance of this code I am using?


P.S. It's been more than 10 minutes but the code for z=0.5 has not processed.


For your reference, I am attaching the contour plot for z=0.


enter image description here


This is the output for z=0.5 from the code above (it took about 10 minutes)


enter image description here



Answer



One helpfull rule to get fast integration is, to do analytical integration as much as you can.


int1 = Integrate[1/Sqrt[(x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 + (z - l)^2], {l, -1, 1}, 

Assumptions -> -1 <= h <= 1 && -1 <= k <= 1 && x \[Element] Reals &&
y \[Element] Reals && z \[Element] Reals]

(* -Log[-z + Sqrt[h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 + z^2]] -
Log[z + Sqrt[h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 + z^2]] +
Log[1 - z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
Log[1 + z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] *)

I do the second integration with the rule based integrator (Rubi) by Albert Rich (see http://www.apmaths.uwo.ca/~arich/ ), because, in contrast to Mathematica, it gives an antiderivative without discontinuities.


rint2[x_, y_, z_, h_, k_] = Int[int1, k];


Take integration values at borders to get the definite integral.


rint2def[x_, y_, z_, h_] = 
rint2[x, y, z, h, 1] - rint2[x, y, z, h, -1] //
Simplify[#, Assumptions -> -1 <= h <= 1 && -1 <= k <= 1 &&
x \[Element] Reals && y \[Element] Reals && z \[Element] Reals] &

(* -h ArcTan[((-1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] +
x ArcTan[((-1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] +
h ArcTan[((1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] -
x ArcTan[((1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] -
h ArcTan[((1 - y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] +
x ArcTan[((1 - y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] -
h ArcTan[((1 + y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] +
x ArcTan[((1 + y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] - (-1 +
z) ArcTanh[(1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] -
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]/(
1 - z)] -
ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
z ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]/(
1 - z)] +
ArcTanh[(1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] +
z ArcTanh[(1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] -
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]/(
1 + z)] -
ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] -
z ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] +
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]/(
1 + z)] - Log[-z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + z^2]] -
Log[-z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + z^2]] +
Log[1 - z + Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
Log[((1 - z + Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]) (1 + z + Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]) (1 + z + Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]))/((z + Sqrt[
1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + z^2]) (z + Sqrt[
1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + z^2]))] *)

The last integration has to be done numericaly.


rint3[x_, y_, z_] := NIntegrate[rint2def[x, y, z, h], {h, -1, 1}]

ContourPlot now finishes within 21 seconds.


ContourPlot[rint3[x, y, 1/2], {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, 
ImageSize -> 400] // Timing


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]