Skip to main content

How to increase performance of this code for plotting a contour plot?


I have an equation which I need to triple integrate over a unit cube. The equation is


pot = NIntegrate[1/Sqrt[(x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 + (z - l)^2], {h,-1,1}, {k,-1, 
1},{l,-1,1}];

As soon as I enter Shift+Enter it immediately processes the command. But now what I want is to plot its ContourPlot for different ${z}$ values (I chose $z=0.5$). So I give the command


ContourPlot[pot /. {z -> 0.5}, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}]


But this piece of code takes just forever to process. I just keep on waiting and waiting but processing never ends (it takes really really long time). I am not sure that how is this such a computationally heavy task. For $z$ other than $0$ it takes longer time.


Is there something that I am doing wrong? I don't think this is a drawback of the device I am using. Is there a way to improve the performance of this code I am using?


P.S. It's been more than 10 minutes but the code for $z=0.5$ has not processed.


For your reference, I am attaching the contour plot for $z=0$.


enter image description here


This is the output for $z=0.5$ from the code above (it took about 10 minutes)


enter image description here



Answer



One helpfull rule to get fast integration is, to do analytical integration as much as you can.


int1 = Integrate[1/Sqrt[(x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 + (z - l)^2], {l, -1, 1}, 

Assumptions -> -1 <= h <= 1 && -1 <= k <= 1 && x \[Element] Reals &&
y \[Element] Reals && z \[Element] Reals]

(* -Log[-z + Sqrt[h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 + z^2]] -
Log[z + Sqrt[h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 + z^2]] +
Log[1 - z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
Log[1 + z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 + k^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 k y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] *)

I do the second integration with the rule based integrator (Rubi) by Albert Rich (see http://www.apmaths.uwo.ca/~arich/ ), because, in contrast to Mathematica, it gives an antiderivative without discontinuities.


rint2[x_, y_, z_, h_, k_] = Int[int1, k];


Take integration values at borders to get the definite integral.


rint2def[x_, y_, z_, h_] = 
rint2[x, y, z, h, 1] - rint2[x, y, z, h, -1] //
Simplify[#, Assumptions -> -1 <= h <= 1 && -1 <= k <= 1 &&
x \[Element] Reals && y \[Element] Reals && z \[Element] Reals] &

(* -h ArcTan[((-1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] +
x ArcTan[((-1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] +
h ArcTan[((1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] -
x ArcTan[((1 + y) (-1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2])] -
h ArcTan[((1 - y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] +
x ArcTan[((1 - y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] -
h ArcTan[((1 + y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] +
x ArcTan[((1 + y) (1 + z))/((h - x) Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2])] - (-1 +
z) ArcTanh[(1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] -
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]/(
1 - z)] -
ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
z ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]/(
1 - z)] +
ArcTanh[(1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] +
z ArcTanh[(1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] -
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]/(
1 + z)] -
ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] -
z ArcTanh[(-1 - y)/Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]] +
y ArcTanh[Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]/(
1 + z)] - Log[-z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + z^2]] -
Log[-z + Sqrt[1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + z^2]] +
Log[1 - z + Sqrt[2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]] +
Log[((1 - z + Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 - 2 z + z^2]) (1 + z + Sqrt[
2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]) (1 + z + Sqrt[

2 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + 2 z + z^2]))/((z + Sqrt[
1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 - 2 y + y^2 + z^2]) (z + Sqrt[
1 + h^2 - 2 h x + x^2 + 2 y + y^2 + z^2]))] *)

The last integration has to be done numericaly.


rint3[x_, y_, z_] := NIntegrate[rint2def[x, y, z, h], {h, -1, 1}]

ContourPlot now finishes within 21 seconds.


ContourPlot[rint3[x, y, 1/2], {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, 
ImageSize -> 400] // Timing


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...