Skip to main content

list manipulation - Riffle and Partition


At some point I noticed that I was using Riffle and Partition together a lot. I would do things like



Partition[Riffle[{1,2,3},{4,5,6}],2]

or


Partition[Riffle[{1,2,3}, 6 , {2, -1, 2}], 2]

The question is: are better alternatives, in terms of memory and speed?



Answer



Here is a solution for both "idioms", using LibraryLink and some kind of custom generics. I'm not sure if I like the abstractions, but here is the answer anyway.


<< SymbolicC`
<< Developer`

<< CCompilerDriver`
<< CCodeGenerator`

The definitions below are made to help abstract this function, so that it works for integers, real numbers and complex numbers.


(*lfn is short for library function name*)
(*LL is short for LibraryLink*)

typeTableHeaders = {"type name", "c type", "LL generic name",
"abbreviation in lfn"};
typeTable =

{
{Integer, "mint", "Integer", "I"},
{Real, "mreal", "Real", "R"},
{Complex, "mcomplex", "Complex", "C"}
};
cTypes = typeTable[[All, 2]];

abstractFunctionName = "parif";

libraryFunctionNames =

abstractFunctionName <> "T" <> # <> "_T" & /@ typeTable[[All, 4]];

getters = StringJoin["MArgument_get", #] & /@ typeTable[[All, 3]];

dataGetters = "MTensor_get" <> # <> "Data" & /@ typeTable[[All, 3]];

tensorTypes = "MType_" <> # & /@ typeTable[[All, 3]];

libraryFunctionNamesSingle = # <> "Single" & /@ libraryFunctionNames;
libraryFunctionNamesMulti = # <> "Multi" & /@ libraryFunctionNames;


relations =
Hold@
{
getter -> getters,
dataGetter -> dataGetters,
type -> cTypes ,
tensorType -> tensorTypes
};


preRules = Thread /@ First@ MapAt[HoldPattern, relations, {1, All, 1}];

The next definitions distinguish between the "single" case where we want to riffle with a constant, and the "multi" case where we want to riffle two lists. I have not taken the effort of making this code more expressive. That is, there is some duplicate code.


preRulesSingle =
Append[
preRules,
Thread[libraryFunctionName -> libraryFunctionNamesSingle]
];

singleDIERule =

setupSecondInputAccess :>
Sequence[
CDeclare[type, "inputSingleton"],
CAssign["inputSingleton", CCall[getter, CArray["Args", 1]]]
];

rulesSingle =
Thread[
Join[
preRulesSingle

,
{
HoldPattern@inputElement -> "inputSingleton",
HoldPattern@determineNextInputElement :> Sequence[],
disownIfNeeded :> Sequence[],
singleDIERule
}
]
];


preRulesMulti =
Append[
preRules,
Thread[libraryFunctionName -> libraryFunctionNamesMulti]
];


multiDIERule =
setupSecondInputAccess :>
Sequence[

CDeclare["MTensor", "input2"],
CAssign["input2",
CCall["MArgument_getMTensor", CArray["Args", 1]]],
CDeclare[CPointerType[type], "input2DataPtr"],
CAssign[
"input2DataPtr",
CCall[CPointerMember["libData", dataGetter], {"input2"}]
]
];


rulesMulti =
Thread[
Join[
preRulesMulti
,
{
HoldPattern@inputElement -> CDereference["input2DataPtr"],
HoldPattern@determineNextInputElement :>
COperator[Increment, "input2DataPtr"],
disownIfNeeded :>

CCall[CPointerMember["libData", "MTensor_disown"], "input2"],
multiDIERule
}
]
];

Now we construct some SymbolicC with some tokens inside it


parifSCHeld =
Hold@
CFunction[

"int"
,
libraryFunctionName
,
{{"WolframLibraryData", "libData"}, {"mint",
"Argc"}, {CPointerType["MArgument"], "Args"}, {"MArgument",
"Res"}}
,

CBlock[

{
CDeclare["int", CAssign["err", "LIBRARY_NO_ERROR"]],
CDeclare["MTensor", "input"],
CDeclare["MTensor", "result"],
CDeclare["int", "inputLength"],
CDeclare["mint", CArray["resultDimensions", 2]],
CAssign[
"input",
CCall["MArgument_getMTensor", CArray["Args", 0]]
],

CAssign[
"inputLength",
CDereference[
CCall[
CPointerMember["libData", "MTensor_getDimensions"],
{"input"}
]
]
],
CAssign[

CArray["resultDimensions", 0],
"inputLength"
],
CAssign[
CArray["resultDimensions", 1],
2
]
,
CAssign["err",
CCall[

CPointerMember["libData", "MTensor_new"],
{tensorType, 2, "resultDimensions", CAddress["result"]}
]
]
,
CDeclare[CPointerType[type], "inputDataPtr"],
CAssign[
"inputDataPtr",
CCall[
CPointerMember["libData", dataGetter],

{"input"}
]
],
CDeclare[CPointerType[type], "resultDataPtr"],
CAssign[
"resultDataPtr",
CCall[
CPointerMember["libData", dataGetter],
{"result"}
]

]
,
CDeclare["long", CAssign["iter", 0]]
,
setupSecondInputAccess
,
CWhile[
COperator[Less, {"iter", "inputLength"}],
CBlock[
{

CAssign[
CDereference["resultDataPtr"],
CDereference["inputDataPtr"]
],

COperator[Increment, "resultDataPtr"],
COperator[Increment, "inputDataPtr"],
CAssign[
CDereference["resultDataPtr"],
inputElement

],
determineNextInputElement,
COperator[Increment, "resultDataPtr"],
COperator[Increment, "iter"]
}
]
]
,
CCall["MArgument_setMTensor", {"Res", "result"}],
CCall[CPointerMember["libData", "MTensor_disown"], "input"],

disownIfNeeded,
CReturn["err"]
}
]
];

Now, we turn it into a string, that would normally correspond to the contents of a .c file.


symbCWithReplacementsSingle = parifSCHeld //. rulesSingle;
symbCWithReplacementsMulti = parifSCHeld //. rulesMulti;
cStrings =

"DLLEXPORT" <> " " <> ToCCodeString@First@# & /@
Join[symbCWithReplacementsSingle, symbCWithReplacementsMulti];
cFunctionsString = StringRiffle[cStrings, "\n\n"];

boilerPlate = "
#include \"WolframLibrary.h\"

/* Return the version of Library Link */
DLLEXPORT mint WolframLibrary_getVersion( ) {
\treturn WolframLibraryVersion;

}

/* Initialize Library */
DLLEXPORT int WolframLibrary_initialize( WolframLibraryData \
libData) {
\treturn LIBRARY_NO_ERROR;
}

/* Uninitialize Library */
DLLEXPORT void WolframLibrary_uninitialize( WolframLibraryData \

libData) {
\treturn;
}

";

totalCString = boilerPlate <> cFunctionsString;

The code below creates the library.


libName = "parif";

CreateLibrary[totalCString, libName]

This loads the functions (again duplicate code)


parifFunctionsSingle = 
LibraryFunctionLoad[
libName, #2, {{#, 1, "Shared"}, {#}}, {#, 2}] & @@@
Transpose@{typeTable[[All, 1]], libraryFunctionNamesSingle};

Set @@ {ToExpression["parifSingle" <> #, InputForm,
Unevaluated], #2} & @@@

Transpose@{typeTable[[All, 4]], parifFunctionsSingle};

parifFunctionsMulti =
LibraryFunctionLoad[
libName, #2, {{#, 1, "Shared"}, {#, 1, "Shared"}}, {#, 2}] & @@@
Transpose@{typeTable[[All, 1]], libraryFunctionNamesMulti};

Set @@ {ToExpression["parifMulti" <> #, InputForm,
Unevaluated], #2} & @@@
Transpose@{typeTable[[All, 4]], parifFunctionsMulti};


Timing comparisons


betterish[a_List,const_]:=Transpose[{a,ConstantArray[const,Length@a]}];
arFlatWiz[a_,b_]:= ArrayFlatten[{{{a}\[Transpose],b}}];

nn=10^7;
randomIntegers=RandomInteger[100,nn];

(resB=betterish[randomIntegers,2])//RepeatedTiming//First
(resAFW=arFlatWiz[randomIntegers, 2])//RepeatedTiming//First

(resSI=parifSingleI[randomIntegers,2])//RepeatedTiming//First

resB === resAFW===resSI

gives



0.201
0.213
0.0769
True


And


randomReals1=RandomReal[1,nn];
randomReals2=RandomReal[1,nn];

(resT=Transpose@{randomReals1, randomReals2})//RepeatedTiming//First
(resMRLL=parifMultiR[randomReals1,randomReals2])//RepeatedTiming//First

resMRLL===resT


gives



0.18
0.0838
True

So indeed we are faster than Transpose here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...