Skip to main content

plotting - How can I improve my code for visualizing a complex map?


This code visualize a complex map, but it looks rather cumbersome:


F[z_] := z^2;
t1 = 0;

t2 = Pi/3;
r1 = 1;
r2 = 3;
dt = (t2 - t1)/10;
dr = (r2 - r1)/10;

p1 = Show[
Table[ParametricPlot[ReIm[r Exp[I t]], {r, r1, r2}], {t, t1, t2,
dt}],
Table[ParametricPlot[ReIm[r Exp[I t]], {t, t1, t2}], {r, r1, r2,

dr}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[r Exp[I 4 dt]], {r, r1 + 5 dr, r1 + 6 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[r Exp[I 5 dt]], {r, r1 + 5 dr, r1 + 6 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[r Exp[I 6 dt]], {r, r1 + 6 dr, r1 + 7 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[r Exp[I 3 dt]], {r, r1 + 6 dr, r1 + 7 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[

ReIm[(r1 + 7 dr) Exp[I t]], {t, t1 + 3 dt, t1 + 6 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[
ReIm[(r1 + 6 dr) Exp[I t]], {t, t1 + 3 dt, t1 + 4 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[
ReIm[(r1 + 6 dr) Exp[I t]], {t, t1 + 5 dt, t1 + 6 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[
ReIm[(r1 + 5 dr) Exp[I t]], {t, t1 + 4 dt, t1 + 5 dt},

PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
Axes -> None, PlotRange -> All]

p2 = Show[
Table[ParametricPlot[ReIm[F[r Exp[I t]]], {t, t1, t2}], {r, r1, r2,
dr}],
Table[ParametricPlot[ReIm[F[r Exp[I t]]], {r, r1, r2}], {t, t1, t2,
dt}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[(r Exp[I 4 dt])^2], {r, r1 + 5 dr, r1 + 6 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],

ParametricPlot[ReIm[(r Exp[I 5 dt])^2], {r, r1 + 5 dr, r1 + 6 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[(r Exp[I 6 dt])^2], {r, r1 + 6 dr, r1 + 7 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[ReIm[(r Exp[I 3 dt])^2], {r, r1 + 6 dr, r1 + 7 dr},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[
ReIm[((r1 + 7 dr) Exp[I t])^2], {t, t1 + 3 dt, t1 + 6 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[

ReIm[((r1 + 6 dr) Exp[I t])^2], {t, t1 + 3 dt, t1 + 4 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[
ReIm[((r1 + 6 dr) Exp[I t])^2], {t, t1 + 5 dt, t1 + 6 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ParametricPlot[
ReIm[((r1 + 5 dr) Exp[I t])^2], {t, t1 + 4 dt, t1 + 5 dt},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thickness[0.01]}],
ImageSize -> 200,
Axes -> None,

PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here enter image description here


I'm wondering if there is a way to make it significantly shorter since there are lots of repeating functions used.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]