Skip to main content

probability or statistics - Histograms with pre-counted data


I've got some large data sets which have been counted but not binned already - essentially, a list of pairs of values (not bins) and counts.* (Or, equivalently, it's been binned into too-small bins.) I want to plot histograms for them. I remember the deprecated version of Histogram from a separate package had a FrequencyData option, but that seems to have disappeared. Is there any built-in way to accomplish this now? (I'd like to still have all the fancy features of Histogram, i.e. I don't want to just rebin the data myself and plot it directly. Notably I'd like to still be able to use Histogram's automatic bin specification, or something like it.)


*That is, my data is represented as {{1, 6}, {2, 4}, {3, 2}, ...} instead of {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, ...}. (And before anyone suggests just expanding the data to the latter form to pass to Histogram: there are over 100K values, and the total count is over 100M.)


Edit: okay, let me be really explicit. The perfect thing would be to be able to take the first representation of the data ({{1,6}, ...}), and get exactly what Histogram would have produced had I given it the second version ({1,1,1,1,...}), without having to actually expand it to that form. (This includes being able to specify various options and extra arguments to Histogram.) I do not want a bar chart with 100K bars. I do not want to have to decide how many bins to make every time I do this, because I may do it many times with many varieties of data.



Answer



Histogram doesn't have any built-in support for weighted data, although it's an interesting idea, and most of the binning algorithms should be amenable to working with it.




That being said, here's a WeightedHistogram function, with some feedback from Andy Ross. It accepts



  • weighted values (in the same format as RandomChoice and EmpiricalDistribution)


  • binning specifications

  • Histogram options.


It doesn't support the height functions, since they'd have to be manually implemented. (This isn't hard, just a bit tedious since there are several of them.)


The implementation creates a representative sample of the data to compute the bins from. This is combined with the list of actual values to make sure we cover the extremes, which might have low weights and otherwise not show up in the sample.


Options[WeightedHistogram] = 
Append[Options[Histogram], "SampleSize" -> 1000];

WeightedHistogram[weights_ -> values_, o : OptionsPattern[]] :=
WeightedHistogram[weights -> values, Automatic, o]


WeightedHistogram[weights_ -> values_, bins_, o : OptionsPattern[]] :=
Block[{sample, newbins, valuelists, partitions},
sample = Join[
RandomChoice[weights -> values, OptionValue["SampleSize"]],
values];
newbins = First[HistogramList[sample, bins]];
partitions = Partition[newbins, 2, 1];
valuelists =
Total[Pick[weights, Thread[# <= values < #2]]] & @@@ partitions;

Histogram[values, {newbins}, valuelists &,
FilterRules[Flatten[{o}], Options[Histogram]]]
]

Now let's try it out with some data that is easily weighted:


data = RandomVariate[PoissonDistribution[30], 10^5];
{values, weights} = Transpose[Tally[data]];

Here's the Histogram applied to the original data:


Histogram[data]


enter image description here


Here's the weighted data, in vanilla and rainbow flavors:


Row[{
WeightedHistogram[weights -> values],
WeightedHistogram[weights -> values, {1}, ChartStyle -> "Rainbow"]
}]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...