Skip to main content

packages - Is there a bug in AssociatePairs?



Bug introduced in 10.0 and fixed in 10.1.0




In Version 10, the GeneralUtilities package contain some useful functions. AssociatePairs is one of those functions included in the package and advertised to work as follows:


Needs["GeneralUtilities`"]

?AssociatePairs

Mathematica graphics


Well, here is an input that matches a List of pairs:


lis = Table[{k, k^3}, {k, 2, 10}];


Now,


AssociatePairs[lis]

Gives the following error:


Mathematica graphics


Well, the included PairQ function disagrees with this assertion:


AllTrue[lis, PairQ]



True



So, is this a bug? Since I can't get any list of pairs to work with this function. I'm on Windows 8.1



Answer



Using Simon Woods's Spelunk we see that the body of the function is:


Self : AssociatePairs[l_] := 
Module[{r$},
r$ = Which[! Quiet[TrueQ[MatrixQ[l, PairQ]]], Message[AssociatePairs::npairs, l];
$FailRHS, True, HoldSequence[Associate @@ Transpose[l]]];
ReleaseHoldSequence[r$] /; ! MatchQ[r$, $FailRHS | HoldSequence[$FailRHS]]

]

I draw your attention to:


TrueQ[MatrixQ[l, PairQ]]

Recalling the definition of MatrixQ:


enter image description here


This means that the function is checking that:





  1. l (input) is a matrix




  2. each element passes PairQ




This is apparently illogical.


One could correct this with one of many other possible checks, simplest perhaps:


MatchQ[l, {{_, _} ..}]


Or to allow for SparseArray input, as may have been the motivation for MatrixQ:


MatchQ[Dimensions[l], {_, 2}] && MatrixQ[l]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...