equation solving - Find *all* numerical solutions to cosine based equality

equation solving - Find all numerical solutions to cosine based equality

To help with https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/11456/ I'm trying to find all numerical solutions to:

5.20427*Sin[0.529699*t] == Sin[2*Pi*t]

Since the period of the first function is 11.8618, I would expect to see 2 answers per period, or about one answer for every length 5.9309 interval.

At first, the graphs of these functions (for 0<=t<=12):

seem to bear this out.

However, the graph for 11<=t<=13:

shows the situation can be much worse, with two "extra" nearly equal solutions in addition the "expected" solution.

Is there any good way to find all numerical solutions, including these "corner cases"?

Answer

NSolve (or Reduce as pointed out by @ciao in the comments above) will find all solutions in a specified interval

$Version

"10.2.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (July 7, 2015)"

NSolve[{5.20427*Sin[0.529699*t] == Sin[2*Pi*t], 0 <= t <= 100}, t]

{{t -> 0.}, {t -> 0.32491}, {t -> 5.97889}, {t -> 11.6173}, {t -> 12.1353}, {t -> 12.2205}, {t -> 17.9356}, {t -> 23.5697}, {t -> 29.8887}, {t -> 35.5261}, {t -> 41.1833}, {t -> 41.4872}, {t -> 41.8327}, {t -> 47.4839}, {t -> 53.1234}, {t -> 53.6101}, {t -> 53.7428}, {t -> 59.4409}, {t -> 65.075}, {t -> 71.3945}, {t -> 77.0312}, {t -> 82.6919}, {t -> 82.9743}, {t -> 83.3401}, {t -> 88.9889}, {t -> 94.6297}, {t -> 95.0909}, {t -> 95.2589}}

In some Mathematica versions there will be a warning message, e.g.,

$Version

"10.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (June 29, 2014)"

NSolve[{5.20427*Sin[0.529699*t] == Sin[2*Pi*t], 0 <= t <= 100}, t]

Solve::ratnz: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients. The answer was obtained by solving a corresponding exact system and numericizing the result. >>

{{t -> 0.}, {t -> 0.32491}, {t -> 5.97889}, {t -> 11.6173}, {t -> 12.1353}, {t -> 12.2205}, {t -> 17.9356}, {t -> 23.5697}, {t -> 29.8887}, {t -> 35.5261}, {t -> 41.1833}, {t -> 41.4872}, {t -> 41.8327}, {t -> 47.4839}, {t -> 53.1234}, {t -> 53.6101}, {t -> 53.7428}, {t -> 59.4409}, {t -> 65.075}, {t -> 71.3945}, {t -> 77.0312}, {t -> 82.6919}, {t -> 82.9743}, {t -> 83.3401}, {t -> 88.9889}, {t -> 94.6297}, {t -> 95.0909}, {t -> 95.2589}}

This warning can be avoided by using Rationalize

NSolve[{5.20427*Sin[0.529699*t] == Sin[2*Pi*t] // Rationalize[#, 0] &, 
  0 <= t <= 100}, t]

Comments

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...

Blog

Search This Blog