Skip to main content

evaluation - Functional-Style Fixed-Length Queue Object?


Following up on question Side-effecting an array in an association? and @Mr.Wizard's answer in there, I'm modernizing and tweaking Daniel Lichtblau's efficient queues and ran into a little roadblock.


First, I came up with the following API, stripped-down for brevity. The queue I want is fixed-length and lossy. Make a new queue with newQ[capacity]. Push values to the back with pushQ[aQueue, aValue]; pop values from the front with popQ[aQueue], just like a queue of humans. If the queue is full, just pop the value at the front, losing it (on purpose)


I want pushQ to return the queue it receives, so that I can fold it and chain it as follows:


Fold[pushQ, newQ[4], Range[10]]

Here's what I came up with, with the functional mojo highlighted:


ClearAll[newQ, emptyQQ, fullQQ, pushQ, popQ, peekQ, bumpQ]; 

newQ[cap_Integer] /; cap > 0 :=
<|"storage" -> ConstantArray[Null, cap],
"len" -> 0, "cap" -> cap,
"iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 1|>;
emptyQQ[Q_] := Q[["len"]] === 0;
fullQQ[Q_] := Q[["len"]] === Q[["cap"]];
peekQ[Q_] := Q[["storage", Q[["iFront"]]]];
SetAttributes[bumpQ, HoldFirst];
bumpQ[Q_, index_] := Q[[index]] = Mod[Q[[index]] + 1, Q[["cap"]], 1];
SetAttributes[pushQ, HoldFirst];

pushQ[Q_, item_] :=
(Q[["storage", Q[["iBack"]]]] = item;
bumpQ[Q, "iBack"];
If[fullQQ[Q],
(*then*)bumpQ[Q, "iFront"],
(*else*)Q[["len"]]++];
Q); (* <<<<<<< HERE IS THE FUNCTIONAL MOJO <<<<<<<< *)
SetAttributes[popQ, HoldFirst];
popQ[Q_] /; emptyQQ[Q] := Null;
popQ[Q_] :=

(Q[["len"]]--;
With[ {result = Q[["storage", Q[["iFront"]]]]},
Q[["storage", Q[["iFront"]]]] = Null;
bumpQ[Q, "iFront"];
result ])

This passes a bunch of unit tests:


$q = newQ[4];
pushQ[$q, 1]; $q["storage"]



{1, Null, Null, Null}

pushQ[$q, 2]; $q["storage"]


{1, 2, Null, Null}

pushQ[$q, 3]; $q["storage"]



{1, 2, 3, Null}

popQ[$q]


1

$q["storage"]



{Null, 2, 3, Null}

popQ[$q]; $q["storage"]


{Null, Null, 3, Null}

pushQ[$q, 4]; $q["storage"]



{Null, Null, 3, 4}

pushQ[$q, 5]; $q["storage"]


{5, Null, 3, 4}

popQ[$q]



3

$q["storage"]


{5, Null, Null, 4}

pushQ[$q, 6]; pushQ[$q, 7]; pushQ[$q, 8]; pushQ[$q, 9]; pushQ[$q, 10];
$q["storage"]



{9, 10, 7, 8}

popQ[$q]


7

and so on. Now, when I try the obvious generalization to folding, I'm back where I started with the ... in the part assignment is not a symbol.



Fold[pushQ, newQ[4], Range[1]]


During evaluation of In[49]:= Set::setps: <|storage->{Null,Null,Null,Null},len->0,cap->4,iFront->1,iBack->1|> in the part assignment is not a symbol. >>
During evaluation of In[49]:= Set::setps: <|storage->{Null,Null,Null,Null},len->0,cap->4,iFront->1,iBack->1|> in the part assignment is not a symbol. >>
During evaluation of In[49]:= General::stop: Further output of Set::setps will be suppressed during this calculation. >>
<|"storage" -> {Null, Null, Null, Null}, "len" -> 0, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 1|>

Ok, I need some kind of symbol for Set to work. A couple more attempts as follows produce the same results, and I did a bunch of tracing and printing, and couldn't see a good way through this:


Module[{$q = newQ[4]}, Fold[pushQ, $q, Range[1]]]



During evaluation of In[48]:= Set::setps: <|storage->{Null,Null,Null,Null},len->0,cap->4,iFront->1,iBack->1|> in the part assignment is not a symbol. >>

Module[{$q = newQ[4]}, Fold[($q = pushQ[#1, #2]) &, $q, Range[1]]]


During evaluation of In[44]:= Set::setps: <|storage->{Null,Null,Null,Null},len->0,cap->4,iFront->1,iBack->1|> in the part assignment is not a symbol. >>

EDIT:



This question is really about elegance because I can get meaningful, useful side effects with Map and Scan, as follows:


Module[{q = newQ[4]}, pushQ[q, #] & /@ Range[10]]


{<|"storage" -> {1, Null, Null, Null}, "len" -> 1, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 2|>, 
<|"storage" -> {1, 2, Null, Null}, "len" -> 2, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 3|>,
<|"storage" -> {1, 2, 3, Null}, "len" -> 3, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 4|>,
<|"storage" -> {1, 2, 3, 4}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 1|>,
<|"storage" -> {5, 2, 3, 4}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 2, "iBack" -> 2|>,
<|"storage" -> {5, 6, 3, 4}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 3, "iBack" -> 3|>,

<|"storage" -> {5, 6, 7, 4}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 4, "iBack" -> 4|>,
<|"storage" -> {5, 6, 7, 8}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 1, "iBack" -> 1|>,
<|"storage" -> {9, 6, 7, 8}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 2, "iBack" -> 2|>,
<|"storage" -> {9, 10, 7, 8}, "len" -> 4, "cap" -> 4, "iFront" -> 3, "iBack" -> 3|>}



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...