Skip to main content

performance tuning - Finding column with maximum sum of by-element products of column subsets efficiently?


A couple of recent questions and associated answers reminded me of an old problem:


As a toy example, take:



SeedRandom[1211]
matsize = 5;
subsize = 3;
mat = RandomInteger[{-10, 10}, {matsize, matsize}];
mat // MatrixForm

$\left( \begin{array}{ccccc} -2 & 8 & 2 & 7 & -7 \\ 5 & -2 & -4 & 2 & -3 \\ 3 & -9 & -1 & -3 & 5 \\ 4 & -7 & 8 & 9 & -7 \\ 4 & 3 & -3 & -8 & 7 \\ \end{array} \right)$


where rows represent some subject/object under test, columns are different sets of conditions, and the elements are an integer score on [-10,10].


It is desired to find the column index whose elements, taken over all subsets of size subsize, have the maximum value when the elements of each subset are multiplied and those products are totaled.


For the toy example, this is column 2, with a result of 487.



A naive way might be


Tr /@ Apply[Times, Subsets[#, {subsize}] & /@ Transpose[mat], {2}] // Ordering // Last

but that will obviously blow RAM for cases with large subset cardinality.


Much more memory efficient, but with its own issues is:


SymmetricPolynomial[subsize, #] & /@ Transpose[mat] // Ordering // Last

How might you do this, with the proviso that I'd prefer pure Mathematica (compilation to WVM is fine, compilation to C means I'rather just write it directly in C or whatever), and the actual use-case is matsize=100 and subsize=30.


Edit: Since adding bounty, I came up with


(Coefficient[Times @@ (1 + #1 x) // Expand, x^#2] // Position[#, Max@#] &) &[mat, subsize]


Fastest way so far (on my box), reasonable RAM use.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...