Skip to main content

code review - Numerical Integration Via Adaptive Simpson's Method


I have written a code that uses the Adaptive Simpson's method to approximate integration. For those who are unaware of this Adaptive Simpson's method; Adaptive Simpson's method


In my code, I count the number of function evaluations are needed. I am wondering if there is a way to reduce the number of function evaluations needed but still retaining the same outputs and error. Here is my code:


Simpson[f_, a_, b_, er_] := Module[{s1, s2, h2, h = (b - a)/2},

s1 = h (f[a] + 4 f[a + h] + f[b])/3;
h2 = h/2;
s2 = h2 (f[a] + 4 f[a + h2] + 2 f[a + h] + 4 f[b - h2] + f[b])/3;


If[Abs[s1 - s2]/15 < er, s2 + (s2 - s1)/15,
Simpson[f, a, a + h, er/2] + Simpson[f, a + h, b, er/2]]];
count = 0;
h[x_] := Module[{}, count++; 3 Sqrt[x]];
N[Simpson[h, 0, 1, 10.^-5] - 2]
count

For example, when approximating the integral of $3*sqrt(x)$ from 0 to 1, my algorithm makes 312 function calls of the function h, but I suspect some of these evaluations are repeated.



Answer




With a simple modification to your code


Simpson[f_, a_, b_, er_] := 
Module[{s1, s2, h2, h = (b - a)/2},
s1 = h (f[a] + 4 f[a + h] + f[b])/3;
h2 = h/2;
s2 = h2 (f[a] + 4 f[a + h2] + 2 f[a + h] + 4 f[b - h2] + f[b])/3;
If[Abs[s1 - s2]/15 < er, s2 + (s2 - s1)/15,
Simpson[f, a, a + h, er/2] + Simpson[f, a + h, b, er/2]]];
count = 0;
h[x_] := Module[{}, Sow[x]; count++; 3 Sqrt[x]];

{result, xvalues} = Reap[N[Simpson[h, 0, 1, 10.^-5] - 2]];
{Length[Union[Flatten[xvalues]]], count}
(* {81, 312} *)

we can see that indeed your code evaluates h 312 times but at only 81 distinct values.


If the execution time of the integration is dominated by evaluating h this is clearly undesirable. A simple fix is to use "memoisation". This avoids re-evaluating h for values of x where it has already been computed. This can easily be done by using a definition for h such as


h[x_]:=h[x]= 3 Sqrt[x]

There is a very clear discussion of this in the Mathematica documentation https://reference.wolfram.com/language/tutorial/FunctionsThatRememberValuesTheyHaveFound.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...