Skip to main content

How to find ids in a curved line in a finite element mesh?


Previous discussion about this problem has already occurred in this link:


How to get the node id in a specific coordinate in a finite element mesh?


I have the following code that generates a finite element mesh


Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]

order = 2;
mesh = ToElementMesh[ImplicitRegion[300 <= Sqrt[x x + y y], {x, y}], {{0, 1000}, {0, 1000}}, MaxCellMeasure -> 2000, "MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 10,"MeshOrder" -> order, "NodeReordering" -> True]
mesh["Wireframe"]
topol = mesh["MeshElements"][[1, 1]];
nnodes = mesh["Coordinates"];

But instead to get the the ids of the nodes that are located in the corners, which was the question in the link above, i want all the ids in a specific line in order to impose the boundary conditions to my problem. For example: i need all the node ids of the line located in the curved hole in order to impose an internal presure using Newmamm boudary conditions. How to solve this?


Published work: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cae.21958


enter image description here



Answer




Here is how I'd do it. Boundary conditions are either applied at nodes (Dirichlet type conditions) or over edges/faces (Neumann type conditions). So, I'd generate a mesh that contains markers for points and edges.


For that we first write a helper function that inserts point markers into the mesh:


Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
pointMarkerFunction = Compile[{{coords, _Real, 2}},
Module[{x, y},
{x, y} = #;
Which[
(* order matters *)
x^2 + y^2 <= 300^2, 5,
x == 1000., 2,

x == 0., 4,
y == 0., 1,
y == 1000., 3,
True, 6]] & /@ coords];

And generate a mesh:


mesh = ToElementMesh[
ImplicitRegion[
300 <= Sqrt[x x + y y], {x, y}], {{0, 1000}, {0, 1000}},
MaxCellMeasure -> 20000

, "PointMarkerFunction" -> pointMarkerFunction
];

Now we look at the point markers:


Show[mesh["Wireframe"],
mesh["Wireframe"["MeshElement" -> "PointElements",
"MeshElementMarkerStyle" -> Red]]]

enter image description here


There are a few things to note here. First, note that the mid-side nodes of the second order mesh do not yet have the proper markers. That's because the marker value of mid-side nodes is derived from the marker values of the edges, which we have not defined yet. The second thing to note is that the order in the Which statement matters. It's set up in such a way that the markers 5 and 2 include both respective corner points. Depending on which edge the corner points should belong to the order here needs to be adjusted.



Next we add the markers for the edges:


boundaryMarkerFunction = 
Compile[{{boundaryElementCoords, _Real,
3}, {pointMarkres, _Integer, 2}},
Module[{pm1 = #[[1]], pm2 = #[[2]]},
Which[
pm1 == pm2, pm1,
pm1 == 1 || pm2 == 1, 1,
pm1 == 3 || pm2 == 3, 3,
pm1 == 4 || pm2 == 4, 4,

True, 6 ]] & /@ pointMarkres];

mesh = ToElementMesh[
ImplicitRegion[
300 <= Sqrt[x x + y y], {x, y}], {{0, 1000}, {0, 1000}},
MaxCellMeasure -> 20000
, "BoundaryMarkerFunction" -> boundaryMarkerFunction
, "PointMarkerFunction" -> pointMarkerFunction
];


Show[mesh["Wireframe"],
mesh["Wireframe"["MeshElement" -> "PointElements",
"MeshElementMarkerStyle" -> Red]]]

enter image description here


Now, the mid-side nodes are correct.The boundary marker function gets two arguments; the coordinates of the edge and the point markers of the connected nodes. In this case I choose to use the point markers of the nodes to determine the edge markers.


We can look at the edge markers:


Show[mesh["Wireframe"],
mesh["Wireframe"["MeshElement" -> "BoundaryElements",
"MeshElementMarkerStyle" -> Blue]]]


enter image description here


Here is a function that extracts the coordinates at a specific marker:


getNodes[mesh_, marker_] := Module[{coords, markerpos, inci},
coords = mesh["Coordinates"];
markerpos =
Flatten[Position[Flatten[ElementMarkers[mesh["PointElements"]]],
marker]];
inci = Flatten[ElementIncidents[mesh["PointElements"]]][[markerpos]];
coords[[inci]]

]

Let's use it for point marker 5:


bcCoords = getNodes[mesh, 5];

And check it:


Norm[300 - Sqrt[Total[bcCoords^2, {2}]]] < 10^-10
True

This gets the curved edges right. As a peak into the future, the marker insertion will be done automatically in a future version of Mathematica. You will find more documentation about markers in the ToBoundaryMesh, ToElementMesh ref. pages and the ElementMesh generation tutorial.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...