Skip to main content

What will happen, if I don't specify random seed by SeedRandom function?


Suppose I want to run several times of the same code containing RandomReal function, but I don't initialise the random seed. What will happen?


I tried, but each time the RandomReal[] return different values, does it mean that Mathematica using some kind of default method to initialise the random number generator even without SeedRandom[]?



Answer



Let's think about when the answer to this question may be relevant. You know that if using the same seed on two different occasions, the RNG will generate the same sequence of numbers. So the relevant questions are:




  1. Does Mathematica use the same seed after startup every time?


    No. This is easy to test.





  2. Many programs take the seed from the system time. Also, the SeedRandom documentation says that "SeedRandom[] resets the generator, using as a seed the time of day and certain attributes of the current Wolfram System session." Is this what Mathematica does on startup?


    Yes. On OS X I ran the following in a terminal:


    math -run Print@RandomReal[] & math -run Print@RandomReal[]

    That is, I started two kernels at the same time and checked if they generate the same sequence of random numbers. They do.




  3. If the seed is taken from the system time, what about parallelization? What if I start up all parallel kernels at the same time? Will they all use the same seed?


    No. The Parallel Tools package takes care of this. Each kernel will use a different seed. You can easily test this using ParallelTable[RandomReal[], {$ProcessorCount}]. You'll get a list of different numbers.





  4. Okay, but what if instead of using in-Mathematica parallelization, I manually run several Mathematica processes in parallel, say on a HPC cluster?


    Modern operating systems come with a nondeterministic random number generator. This gives truly unpredictable random numbers using entropy sources such as keystrokes and network traffic, and is used for cryptographical purposes. You can take the seed from there. Here's a function I used for this in the past. It's only for Unix-like systems (OS X and Linux):


    (* Nondeterministic random numbers from the OS *)

    NondeterministicRandomInteger::usage = "NondeterministicRandomInteger[] returns an unpredictable random integer between 0..2^32-1.";

    NondeterministicRandomInteger::notsupp = "Not supported on ``";


    Switch[$OperatingSystem,
    "MacOSX"|"Unix",
    NondeterministicRandomInteger[] :=
    AbortProtect@Module[{stream, res},
    stream = OpenRead["!head -c 4 /dev/random", BinaryFormat -> True];
    res = BinaryRead[stream, "UnsignedInteger32"];
    Close[stream];
    res
    ],
    _,

    NondeterministicRandomInteger[] := (Message[NondeterministicRandomInteger::notsupp, $OperatingSystem]; $Failed)
    ]

    Use this only for seeding: SeedRandom@NondeterministicRandomInteger[].


    If I did this today, I would use something like boost::random_device through LibraryLink for a better cross platform solution that also works on Windows.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...