Skip to main content

What will happen, if I don't specify random seed by SeedRandom function?


Suppose I want to run several times of the same code containing RandomReal function, but I don't initialise the random seed. What will happen?


I tried, but each time the RandomReal[] return different values, does it mean that Mathematica using some kind of default method to initialise the random number generator even without SeedRandom[]?



Answer



Let's think about when the answer to this question may be relevant. You know that if using the same seed on two different occasions, the RNG will generate the same sequence of numbers. So the relevant questions are:




  1. Does Mathematica use the same seed after startup every time?


    No. This is easy to test.





  2. Many programs take the seed from the system time. Also, the SeedRandom documentation says that "SeedRandom[] resets the generator, using as a seed the time of day and certain attributes of the current Wolfram System session." Is this what Mathematica does on startup?


    Yes. On OS X I ran the following in a terminal:


    math -run Print@RandomReal[] & math -run Print@RandomReal[]

    That is, I started two kernels at the same time and checked if they generate the same sequence of random numbers. They do.




  3. If the seed is taken from the system time, what about parallelization? What if I start up all parallel kernels at the same time? Will they all use the same seed?


    No. The Parallel Tools package takes care of this. Each kernel will use a different seed. You can easily test this using ParallelTable[RandomReal[], {$ProcessorCount}]. You'll get a list of different numbers.





  4. Okay, but what if instead of using in-Mathematica parallelization, I manually run several Mathematica processes in parallel, say on a HPC cluster?


    Modern operating systems come with a nondeterministic random number generator. This gives truly unpredictable random numbers using entropy sources such as keystrokes and network traffic, and is used for cryptographical purposes. You can take the seed from there. Here's a function I used for this in the past. It's only for Unix-like systems (OS X and Linux):


    (* Nondeterministic random numbers from the OS *)

    NondeterministicRandomInteger::usage = "NondeterministicRandomInteger[] returns an unpredictable random integer between 0..2^32-1.";

    NondeterministicRandomInteger::notsupp = "Not supported on ``";


    Switch[$OperatingSystem,
    "MacOSX"|"Unix",
    NondeterministicRandomInteger[] :=
    AbortProtect@Module[{stream, res},
    stream = OpenRead["!head -c 4 /dev/random", BinaryFormat -> True];
    res = BinaryRead[stream, "UnsignedInteger32"];
    Close[stream];
    res
    ],
    _,

    NondeterministicRandomInteger[] := (Message[NondeterministicRandomInteger::notsupp, $OperatingSystem]; $Failed)
    ]

    Use this only for seeding: SeedRandom@NondeterministicRandomInteger[].


    If I did this today, I would use something like boost::random_device through LibraryLink for a better cross platform solution that also works on Windows.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...